Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27709807›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2017

Metagenomics insights into food fermentations.

Francesca De Filippis, Eugenio Parente, Danilo Ercolini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microbial ecology of fermented foods.FEMS yeast research · 2026
    Review
  7. International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. From fruit waste to foods via fermentation.Current research in food science · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Investigating the Microbial Dynamics ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca De FilippisDivision of Microbiology, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Eugenio ParenteDipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Danilo ErcoliniDivision of Microbiology, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes the recent advances in the study of food microbial ecology, with a focus on food fermentations. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies have been widely applied to the study of food microbial consortia and the different applications of HTS technologies were exploited in order to monitor microbial dynamics in food fermentative processes. Phylobiomics was the most explored application in the past decade. Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, although still underexploited, promise to uncover the functionality of complex microbial consortia. The new knowledge acquired will help to understand how to make a profitable use of microbial genetic resources and modulate key activities of beneficial microbes in order to ensure process efficiency, product quality and safety.

Indexed as

FermentationFood MicrobiologyMetagenomicsMicrobial ConsortiaComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID27709807
PMCPMC5270737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.