Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27709558›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2016

DNA copy number alterations, gene expression changes and disease-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a 10 year follow-up.

Elisabetta Bigagli, Carlotta De Filippo, Cinzia Castagnini, Simona Toti, Francesco Acquadro, Francesco Giudici, Marilena Fazi, Piero Dolara, Luca Messerini, Francesco Tonelli and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Copy number variations ofTranslational cancer research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Energy sensing pathways: Bridging type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer?Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabetta BigagliDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy. elisabetta.bigagli@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1892-4343
Carlotta De FilippoInstitute of Biometeorology (IBIMET), National Research Council (CNR), Florence, Italy.
Cinzia CastagniniDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Simona TotiISTAT, Rome, Italy.
Francesco AcquadroMolecular Cytogenetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre-CNIO, Madrid, Spain.
Francesco GiudiciDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marilena FaziDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Piero DolaraDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Luca MesseriniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco TonelliDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Cristina LuceriDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITIstituto di Biometeorologia · ITIstituto Nazionale di Statistica · ITSpanish National Cancer Research Centre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA copy number alterations (CNAs) and gene expression changes have amply been encountered in colorectal cancers (CRCs), but the extent at which CNAs affect gene expression, as well as their relevance for tumor development, are still poorly defined. Here we aimed at assessing the clinical relevance of these parameters in a 10 year follow-up study.

methodsTumors and normal adjacent colon mucosa, obtained at primary surgery from 21 CRC patients, were subjected to (i) high-resolution array CGH (a-CGH) for the detection of CNAs and (ii) microarray-based transcriptome profiling for the detection of gene expression (GE) changes. Correlations between these genomic and transcriptomic changes and their associations with clinical and histopathological parameters were assessed with the aim to identify molecular signatures associated with disease-free survival of the CRC patients during a 10 year follow-up.

resultsDNA copy number gains were frequently detected in chromosomes 7, 8q, 13, 19, 20q and X, whereas DNA copy number losses were frequently detected in chromosomes 1p, 4, 8p, 15, 17p, 18, 19 and 22q. None of these alterations were observed in all samples. In addition, we found that 2,498 genes were up- and that 1,094 genes were down-regulated in the tumor samples compared to their corresponding normal mucosa (p < 0.01). The expression of 65 genes was found to be significantly associated with prognosis (p < 0.01). Specifically, we found that up-regulation of the IL17RA, IGF2BP2 and ABCC2 genes, and of genes acting in the mTOR and cytokine receptor pathways, were strongly associated with a poor survival. Subsequent integrated analyses revealed that increased expression levels of the MMP9, BMP7, UBE2C, I-CAM, NOTCH3, NOTCH1, PTGES2, HMGB1 and ERBB3 genes were associated with copy number gains, whereas decreased expression levels of the MUC1, E2F2, HRAS and SIRT3 genes were associated with copy number losses. Pathways related to cell cycle progression, eicosanoid metabolism, and TGF-β and apoptosis signaling, were found to be most significantly affected.

conclusionsOur results suggest that CNAs in CRC tumor tissues are associated with concomitant changes in the expression of cancer-related genes. In other genes epigenetic mechanism may be at work. Up-regulation of the IL17RA, IGF2BP2 and ABCC2 genes, and of genes acting in the mTOR and cytokine receptor pathways, appear to be associated with a poor survival. These alterations may, in addition to Dukes' staging, be employed as new prognostic biomarkers for the prediction of clinical outcome in CRC patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsComparative Genomic HybridizationDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTranscriptomeMultidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2Colorectal cancerComparative genomic hybridization (CGH)Disease-free survivalDNA copy number alterationsGene expression alterations

Identifiers

PMID27709558
PMCPMC13001874
OpenAlexW2528533047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.