Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27709409›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2018

Radiation-induced gliomas: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

Ryuya Yamanaka, Azusa Hayano, Tomohiko Kanayama

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Synchronous glioblastoma and brain metastases: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryuya YamanakaLaboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School for Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. ryaman@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Azusa HayanoLaboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School for Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Tomohiko KanayamaLaboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School for Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By conducting a systemic search of the PubMed database, we performed a comprehensive literature review to characterize secondary gliomas following radiotherapy treatment and to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy. Our analysis included 296 cases of radiation-induced gliomas. The primary lesion was characterized as a hematological malignancy in 104 cases (35.1 %), pituitary adenoma in 35 (11.8 %), craniopharyngioma in 19 (6.4 %), medulloblastoma in 38 (12.8 %), germ cell tumor in 13 (4.3 %), low-grade glioma in 28 (9.4 %), cancer/sarcoma in 12 (4.0 %), scalp region disease in 15 (5.0 %), meningioma/schwannoma in 13 (4.3 %), metastatic brain tumor in 5 (1.6 %), and other types (e.g., arteriovenous malformations and angiomas) in 14 (4.7 %). The average age of onset for primary lesions was 16.0 ± 15.8 years, and the average radiation dose delivered to the primary lesion was 37.6 ± 20.0 Gy. Secondary gliomas could be divided into grade I (1), grade II (32), grade III (88), and grade IV (173) tumors. The median overall survival for all glioma cases was 11 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 9-12), with a 2-year survival rate of 20.2 %. On multivariate analysis, combined modality treatment and the latency period from the radiotherapy treatment to the glioma diagnosis were variables associated with the overall survival of patients with grade III/IV secondary gliomas. For patients treated with cranial radiotherapy, the risk of secondary glioma incidence warrants a longer follow-up period beyond the standard time frame typically designated for determining the risk of primary tumor relapse. Moreover, combination therapy is a potential treatment option for radiation-induced gliomas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyGliomaHumansNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiotherapyCombined modality treatmentGliomaRadiation-induced gliomaRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID27709409
OpenAlexW2527854737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.