Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2016
Effect of veliparib (ABT-888) on cardiac repolarization in patients with advanced solid tumors: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study.
Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02009631 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Veliparib), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Veliparib (ABT-888) on Cardiac Repolarization in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Veliparib with frontline chemotherapy and as maintenance in Japanese women with ovarian cancer: a subanalysis of efficacy, safety, and antiemetic use in the phase 3 VELIA trial.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Population exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses for rucaparib in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma from Study 10 and ARIEL2.Gynecologic oncology · 2021Article
- PARP inhibitor-induced torsades de pointes in long QT syndrome: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2020Article
- Phase 1 dose-escalation study of single-agent veliparib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.Cancer science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVeliparib (ABT-888) is an orally bioavailable potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and PARP-2. This phase 1 study evaluated the effect of veliparib on corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF).
methodsEligible patients with advanced solid tumors received single-dose oral veliparib (200 mg or 400 mg) or placebo in a 6-sequence, 3-period crossover design. The primary endpoint was the difference in the mean baseline-adjusted QTcF between 400 mg veliparib and placebo (∆∆QTcF) at six post-dose time points. Absence of clinically relevant QTcF effect was shown if the 95 % upper confidence bound (UCB) for the mean ∆∆QTcF was <10 ms for all time points. An exposure-response analysis was also performed.
resultsForty-seven patients were enrolled. Maximum mean ∆∆QTcF of veliparib 400 mg was 6.4 ms, with a 95 % UCB of 8.9 ms; for veliparib 200 mg, the maximum mean ∆∆QTcF was 3.6 ms, with a 95 % UCB of 6.1 ms. No patient had a QTcF value >480 ms or change from baseline in QTcF interval >30 ms. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 36.2, 48.9, and 47.8 % of patients while receiving veliparib 200 mg, veliparib 400 mg, and placebo, respectively. Most common TEAEs were nausea (12.8 %) and myalgia (8.5 %) after veliparib 200 mg, nausea (8.5 %) and vomiting (8.5 %) after veliparib 400 mg, and nausea (6.5 %) after placebo.
conclusionsSingle-dose veliparib (200 mg or 400 mg) did not result in clinically significant QTc prolongation and was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.