Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27709012›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2016

C Trent Brewer, Taosheng Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbial Metabolites as Ligands to Xenobiotic Receptors: Chemical Mimicry as Potential Drugs of the Future.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Pregnane X Receptor and the Gut-Liver Axis: A Recent Update.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sources of Interindividual Variability.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Trent BrewerDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; Integrated Biomedical Sciences Program, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Taosheng ChenDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; Integrated Biomedical Sciences Program, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Regulation of xenobiotic receptors PXR and CAR: implications in drug dispositionR35GM118041 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Taosheng Chen · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Regulation of PXR by cell cycle and phosphorylationR01GM086415 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHEN, TAOSHENG · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Regulation of drug disposition by a novel microRNA-mediated pathwayR01GM110034 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHEN, TAOSHENG · 2014 to 2016
$998k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086415NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110034NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) plays an important and diverse role in mediating xenobiotic induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Several protein isoforms of PXR exist, and they have differential transcriptional activity upon target genes; transcript variants 3 (PXR3) and 4 (PXR4) do not induce target gene expression, whereas transcript variants 1 (PXR1) and 2 (PXR2) respond to agonist by activating target gene expression. PXR protein variants also display differences in protein-protein interactions; PXR1 interacts with p53, whereas PXR3 does not. Furthermore, the transcript variants of PXR that encode these protein isoforms are differentially regulated by methylation and deletions in the respective promoters of the variants, and their expression differs in various human cancers and also in cancerous tissue compared to adjacent normal tissues.

Indexed as

AF, activating functionBAMCA, bacterial artificial chromosome array–based methylated CpG island amplificationCYP, cytochrome P450Drug metabolismGST, glutathione S-transferaseMDR, multidrug resistance proteinNHR, nuclear hormone receptorP-gp, P-glycoproteinPregnane X receptorPXR1, PXR transcript variant 1 (434 residues)PXR2, transcript variant 2 (473 residues)PXR3, transcript variant 3 (397 residues)PXR4, transcript variant 4 (322 residues;AK122990)RACE, 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA endsshRNA, short hairpin RNAsiRNA, small interfering RNATherapeutic responsesToxicityTranscript variantsUGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferaseUTR, untranslated region

Identifiers

PMID27709012
PMCPMC5045535
OpenAlexW2477233589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.