Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27708761›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2016

Collective migration under hydrodynamic interactions: a computational approach.

W Marth, A Voigt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Active inter-cellular forces in collective cell motility.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of Cell Polarization.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue.Journal of physics D: Applied physics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W MarthInstitut für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen , TU Dresden , 01062 Dresden , Germany.
A VoigtInstitut für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany; Dresden Center for Computational Materials Science (DCMS), TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany; Center for Systems Biology Dresden (CSBD), Pfotenhauerstr. 108, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider a generic model for cell motility. Even if a comprehensive understanding of cell motility remains elusive, progress has been achieved in its modelling using a whole-cell physical model. The model takes into account the main mechanisms of cell motility, actin polymerization, actin-myosin dynamics and substrate mediated adhesion (if applicable), and combines them with steric cell-cell and hydrodynamic interactions. The model predicts the onset of collective cell migration, which emerges spontaneously as a result of inelastic collisions of neighbouring cells. Each cell here modelled as an active polar gel is accomplished with two vortices if it moves. Upon collision of two cells, the two vortices which come close to each other annihilate. This leads to a rotation of the cells and together with the deformation and the reorientation of the actin filaments in each cell induces alignment of these cells and leads to persistent translational collective migration. The effect for low Reynolds numbers is as strong as in the non-hydrodynamic model, but it decreases with increasing Reynolds number.

Indexed as

active polar gel theorycollective cell migrationhydrodynamic interactions

Identifiers

PMID27708761
PMCPMC4992740
OpenAlexW2406660942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.