Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27708759›Full record

ReviewInterface focus2016

A mathematical model of GTPase pattern formation during single-cell wound repair.

William R Holmes, Adriana E Golding, William M Bement, Leah Edelstein-Keshet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interface focus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational modeling of single-cell mechanics and cytoskeletal mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

William R HolmesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy , Vanderbilt University , Nashville, TN , USA.
Adriana E GoldingCellular and Molecular Biology Program, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, Department of Zoology , University of Wisconsin , Madison, WI , USA.
William M BementCellular and Molecular Biology Program, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, Department of Zoology , University of Wisconsin , Madison, WI , USA.
Leah Edelstein-KeshetDepartment of Mathematics , University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC , Canada.
BC Studies · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Transient cytoskeletal arraysR01GM052932 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEMENT, WILLIAM · 1997 to 2023
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rho GTPases are regulatory proteins whose patterns on the surface of a cell affect cell polarization, cell motility and repair of single-cell wounds. The stereotypical patterns formed by two such proteins, Rho and Cdc42, around laser-injured frog oocytes permit experimental analysis of GTPase activation, inactivation, segregation and crosstalk. Here, we review the development and analysis of a spatial model of GTPase dynamics that describe the formation of concentric zones of Rho and Cdc42 activity around wounds, and describe how this model has provided insights into the roles of the GTPase effector molecules protein kinase C (PKCβ and PKCη) and guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) in the wound response. We further demonstrate how the use of a 'sharp switch' model approximation in combination with bifurcation analysis can aid mapping the model behaviour in parameter space (approximate results confirmed with numerical simulation methods). Using these methods in combination with experimental manipulation of PKC activity (PKC overexpression (OE) and dominant negative conditions), we have shown that: (i) PKCβ most probably acts by enhancing existing positive feedbacks (from Rho to itself via the guanosine nucleotide exchange factor domain of Abr, and from Cdc42 to itself), (ii) PKCη most probably increases basal rates of inactivation (or possibly decreases basal rates of activation) of Rho and Cdc42, and (iii) the graded distribution of PKCη and its effect on initial Rho activity accounts for inversion of zones in a fraction (20%) of PKCη OE cells. Finally, we speculate that GDIs (which sequester GTPases) may have a critical role in defining the spatial domain, where the wound response may occur. This paper provides a more thorough exposition of the methods of analysis used in the investigation, whereas previous work on this topic was addressed to biologists and abbreviated such discussion.

Indexed as

Cdc42guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibitorsprotein kinase Creaction–diffusion modelRhowound repair

Identifiers

PMID27708759
PMCPMC4992738
OpenAlexW2510220479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.