Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27708657›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Monte Carlo Modeling of Photon Propagation Reveals Highly Scattering Coral Tissue.

Daniel Wangpraseurt, Steven L Jacques, Tracy Petrie, Michael Kühl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Light management by algal aggregates in living photosynthetic hydrogels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Review on Bioinks and their Application in Plant Bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Coral evolutionary responses to microbial symbioses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel WangpraseurtPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, SydneyNSW, Australia; Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenHelsingør, Denmark.
Steven L JacquesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, USA.
Tracy PetrieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, USA.
Michael KühlPlant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, SydneyNSW, Australia; Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenHelsingør, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corals are very efficient at using solar radiation, with photosynthetic quantum efficiencies approaching theoretical limits. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms underlying such outstanding photosynthetic performance through extracting inherent optical properties of the living coral tissue and skeleton in a massive faviid coral. Using Monte Carlo simulations developed for medical tissue optics it is shown that for the investigated faviid coral, the coral tissue was a strongly light scattering matrix with a reduced scattering coefficient of μ

Indexed as

algaebiophysicscoral opticscoral tissuemicroorganismsMonte Carlo simulationphotosynthesissymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID27708657
PMCPMC5030289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.