ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Is the Sensorimotor Cortex Relevant for Speech Perception and Understanding? An Integrative Review.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Semantically defined subdomains of functional neuroimaging literature and their corresponding brain regions.Human brain mapping · 2018Pooled it
- Sex differences in early sensorimotor processing for speech discrimination.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Embodied Speech: Sensorimotor Contributions to Native and Non-Native Phoneme Processing and Learning.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Review
- From cortical and white matter structure to meaning: a brain-constrained neural network of semantic grounding in action and perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Shared phonological networks in frontal and temporal cortex for language production and comprehension.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Moving rhythmically can facilitate naturalistic speech perception in a noisy environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Neural representation of sensorimotor features in language-motor areas during auditory and visual perception.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Neural representation of phonological wordform in temporal cortex.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- How does the human brain process noisy speech in real life? Insights from the second-person neuroscience perspective.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Review
- Predictive language processing: integrating comprehension and production, and what atypical populations can tell us.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Role of articulatory motor networks in perceptual categorization of speech signals: a 7T fMRI study.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Successful aging of musicians: Preservation of sensorimotor regions aids audiovisual speech-in-noise perception.Science advances · 2023Article
- Spectrotemporal content of human auditory working memory represented in functional connectivity patterns.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Neural evidence suggests phonological acceptability judgments reflect similarity, not constraint evaluation.Cognition · 2023Article
- Time course of effective connectivity associated with perspective taking in utterance comprehension.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Aphasia improvement without logotherapy during motor neurorehabilitation of post-stroke hemiparesis using virtual reality or modified constraint-induced movement therapy: A retrospective cohort.NeuroRehabilitation · 2023Article
- Lexicality-Modulated Influence of Auditory Cortex on Subthalamic Nucleus During Motor Planning for Speech.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Linguistic signs in action: The neuropragmatics of speech acts.Brain and language · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the neuroscience of language, phonemes are frequently described as multimodal units whose neuronal representations are distributed across perisylvian cortical regions, including auditory and sensorimotor areas. A different position views phonemes primarily as acoustic entities with posterior temporal localization, which are functionally independent from frontoparietal articulatory programs. To address this current controversy, we here discuss experimental results from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as well as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. On first glance, a mixed picture emerges, with earlier research documenting neurofunctional distinctions between phonemes in both temporal and frontoparietal sensorimotor systems, but some recent work seemingly failing to replicate the latter. Detailed analysis of methodological differences between studies reveals that the way experiments are set up explains whether sensorimotor cortex maps phonological information during speech perception or not. In particular, acoustic noise during the experiment and 'motor noise' caused by button press tasks work against the frontoparietal manifestation of phonemes. We highlight recent studies using sparse imaging and passive speech perception tasks along with multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and especially representational similarity analysis (RSA), which succeeded in separating acoustic-phonological from general-acoustic processes and in mapping specific phonological information on temporal and frontoparietal regions. The question about a causal role of sensorimotor cortex on speech perception and understanding is addressed by reviewing recent TMS studies. We conclude that frontoparietal cortices, including ventral motor and somatosensory areas, reflect phonological information during speech perception and exert a causal influence on language understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.