Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27708470›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2016

Visual health screening by schoolteachers in remote communities of Peru: implementation research.

Sergio Latorre-Arteaga, Diana Gil-González, Covadonga Bascarán, Richard Hurtado Núñez, María Del Carmen Peral Morales, Guillermo Carrillo Orihuela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergio Latorre-ArteagaPublic Health Research Group, University of Alicante, Campus San Vicente del Raspeig, Ap. 99 CP 03080, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain .
Diana Gil-GonzálezPublic Health Research Group, University of Alicante, Campus San Vicente del Raspeig, Ap. 99 CP 03080, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain .
Covadonga BascaránInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England .
Richard Hurtado NúñezRegional Educational Direction of Apurimac, Abancay, Peru .
María Del Carmen Peral MoralesONCE Foundation for Solidarity with Blind People in Latin America, Madrid, Spain .
Guillermo Carrillo OrihuelaUniversidad Peruana Los Andes, Lima, Peru .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the adaptation and scaling-up of an intervention to improve the visual health of children in the Apurimac region, Peru.

methodsIn a pilot screening programme in 2009-2010, 26 schoolteachers were trained to detect and refer visual acuity problems in schoolchildren in one district in Apurimac. To scale-up the intervention, lessons learnt from the pilot were used to design strategies for: (i) strengthening multisector partnerships; (ii) promoting the engagement and participation of teachers and (iii) increasing children's attendance at referral eye clinics. Implementation began in February 2015 in two out of eight provinces of Apurimac, including hard-to-reach communities. We made an observational study of the processes and outcomes of adapting and scaling-up the intervention. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were made of data collected from March 2015 to January 2016 from programme documents, routine reports and structured evaluation questionnaires completed by teachers.

findingsPartnerships were expanded after sharing the results of the pilot phase. Training was completed by 355 teachers and directors in both provinces, belonging to 315 schools distributed in 24 districts. Teachers' appraisal of the training achieved high positive scores. Outreach eye clinics and subsidies for glasses were provided for poorer families. Data from six districts showed that attendance at the eye clinic increased from 66% (45/68 children referred) in the pilot phase to 92% (237/259) in the implementation phase.

conclusionAdaptation to the local context allowed the scaling-up of an intervention to improve visual health in children and enhanced the equity of the programme.

Indexed as

FacultyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Institutional RelationsEyeglassesHealth PromotionHumansPeruPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationRefractive ErrorsRural PopulationSchoolsVision Screening

Identifiers

PMID27708470
PMCPMC5034634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.