Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27708117›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2017

Deflection Analysis of Different Needle Designs for Prostate Biopsy and Focal Therapy.

Nelson N Stone, Vladimir Mouraviev, David Schechter, Josh Goetz, M Scott Lucia, E Erin Smith, E David Crawford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Needle deflection and tissue sampling length in needle biopsy.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nelson N Stone1 Department of Urology and Radiation Oncology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai, NY, USA.
Vladimir Mouraviev2 Department of Urology, Bladder Health and Reconstructive Institute, Memorial Hospital Miramar, Miramar, FL, USA.
David Schechter3 Vention Medical, Boulder, CO, USA.
Josh Goetz3 Vention Medical, Boulder, CO, USA.
M Scott Lucia4 Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Aurora, CO, USA.
E Erin Smith5 Department of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Aurora, CO, USA.
E David Crawford5 Department of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMemorial Hospital · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe biopsy needles currently used were designed for a transrectal biopsy and are known to experience significant deflection from the point of entry into the gland to the needle tip.

methodsFive designs were selected for testing: 18-gauge Bard, 15-gauge lancet tip needle with 12° vet-point cannula, and trocar tip needle with 12°, 15°, and 20° vet-point cannulas. The 15-gauge needle was designed to take a variable specimen sample between 20 and 60 mm, whereas the Bard needle specimen bed was fixed at 20 mm. The needles were bench tested on a spring-loaded platform and fired into gelatin matrix with modulus of elasticity similar to human prostate.

resultsThe Bard device with lancet tip needle deflected an average of 0.9 mm (range 0.3-1.3 mm) and 1.9° (range 0.6°-2.8°). Increasing needle diameter from 18-gauge Bard to 15-gauge variable with the same lancet tip needle design resulted in an average deflection across the 3 test lengths of 0.9 mm (range 0-2.0 mm) and 0.9° (range 0°-2.0°) with no significant difference. On the contrary, the use of the 3-point trocar tip needles with 12°, 15°, and 20° vet-point cannulas demonstrated significant reduction in the extent of deflection in both millimeters and degrees. There was no deflection at the 2- and 4-cm shots for both spring loads and preloads for the 3 vet tip angles tested. At 6 cm, the 20° vet tip performed the best.

conclusionWe proposed a mechanism that provides more accurate prostate sampling by combining a 3-point trocar tip on the needle with a 20° vet tip on the cutting cannula. Using the phantom, mimicking prostate gland tissue density, no deflection was revealed between 20- and 60-mm biopsy lengths, which should permit a straight sample in the majority of prostate glands and improve cancer localization for focal therapy planning.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignBiopsy, NeedleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleProstatic Neoplasmsdeflection of biopsy needlesprostate cancertransperineal template-mapping biopsytransrectal ultrasoundtrocar tip needle

Identifiers

PMID27708117
PMCPMC5665157
OpenAlexW2528291203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.