Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27708050›Full record

ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Breathtaking Songs: Coordinating the Neural Circuits for Breathing and Singing.

Marc F Schmidt, Franz Goller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Respiratory contributions to birdsong-evolutionary considerations and open questions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic variation interacts with experience to determine interindividual differences in learned song.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Nonlinear dynamics in the study of birdsong.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc F SchmidtUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and marcschm@sas.upenn.edu F.Goller@utah.edu.
Franz GollerUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah marcschm@sas.upenn.edu F.Goller@utah.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms for producing complex sounds R01DC006876 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GOLLER, FRANZ · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vocal behavior of birds is remarkable for its diversity, and songs can feature elaborate characteristics such as long duration, rapid temporal pattern, and broad frequency range. The respiratory system plays a central role in generating the complex song patterns that must be integrated with its life-sustaining functions. Here, we explore how precise coordination between the neural circuits for breathing and singing is fundamental to production of these remarkable behaviors.

Indexed as

RespirationSingingAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBirdsHumansNerve NetTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27708050
PMCPMC6195667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.