Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27707839›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Development of a RNA-Seq Based Prognostic Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Sudhanshu Shukla, Joseph R Evans, Rohit Malik, Felix Y Feng, Saravana M Dhanasekaran, Xuhong Cao, Guoan Chen, David G Beer, Hui Jiang, Arul M Chinnaiyan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integration analysis ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrating the analysis of human biopsies using post-translational modifications proteomics.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhanshu ShuklaDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Joseph R EvansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rohit MalikDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Felix Y FengMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Saravana M DhanasekaranDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Xuhong CaoDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Guoan ChenDepartment of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
David G BeerDepartment of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Hui JiangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Arul M ChinnaiyanDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Center for Translational Pathology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Precision therapy for lung cancer will require comprehensive genomic testing to identify actionable targets as well as ascertain disease prognosis. RNA-seq is a robust platform that meets these requirements, but microarray-derived prognostic signatures are not optimal for RNA-seq data. Thus, we undertook the first prognostic analysis of lung adenocarcinoma RNA-seq data and generated a prognostic signature. Methods: Lung adenocarcinoma RNA-seq and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were divided chronologically into training (n = 255) and validation (n = 157) cohorts. In the training cohort, prognostic association was assessed by univariate Cox analysis. A prognostic signature was built with stepwise multivariable Cox analysis. Outcomes by risk group, stage, and mutation status were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox analyses. All the statistical tests were two-sided. Results: In the training cohort, 96 genes had prognostic association with P values of less than or equal to 1.00x10 Conclusions: Here, we present the first RNA-seq prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma that can provide a powerful prognostic tool for precision oncology as part of an integrated RNA-seq clinical sequencing program.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeAdenocarcinomaAgedAntigens, CDDatabases, GeneticFemaleGPI-Linked ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedMutationAntigens, CDCD109 protein, humanFRRS1L protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRHOV protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27707839
PMCPMC5051943
OpenAlexW2529340146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.