Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27707824›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Experiences of long-term life-limiting conditions among patients and carers: what can we learn from a meta-review of systematic reviews of qualitative studies of chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic kidney disease?

Carl R May, Amanda Cummings, Michelle Myall, Jonathan Harvey, Catherine Pope, Peter Griffiths, Paul Roderick, Mick Arber, Kasey Boehmer, Frances S Mair and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dimensions of Social Capital for Supporting Informal Carers of Patients With Advanced Chronic Illness in the Community: A Concept Mapping Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Carl R MayFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Amanda CummingsFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michelle MyallFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jonathan HarveyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Catherine PopeFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Peter GriffithsFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul RoderickNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Mick ArberYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
Kasey BoehmerKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Frances S MairDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alison RichardsonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo summarise and synthesise published qualitative studies to characterise factors that shape patient and caregiver experiences of chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

designMeta-review of qualitative systematic reviews and metasyntheses. Papers analysed using content analysis. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from January 2000 to April 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Systematic reviews and qualitative metasyntheses where the participants were patients, caregivers and which described experiences of care for CHF, COPD and CKD in primary and secondary care who were aged ≥18 years.

resultsSearches identified 5420 articles, 53 of which met inclusion criteria. Reviews showed that patients' and caregivers' help seeking and decision-making were shaped by their degree of structural advantage (socioeconomic status, spatial location, health service quality); their degree of interactional advantage (cognitive advantage, affective state and interaction quality) and their degree of structural resilience (adaptation to adversity, competence in managing care and caregiver response to demands).

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first synthesis of qualitative systematic reviews in the field. An important outcome of this overview is an emphasis on what patients and caregivers value and on attributes of healthcare systems, relationships and practices that affect the distressing effects and consequences of pathophysiological deterioration in CHF, COPD and CKD. Interventions that seek to empower individual patients may have limited effectiveness for those who are most affected by the combined weight of structural, relational and practical disadvantage identified in this overview. We identify potential targets for interventions that could address these disadvantages. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014014547.

Indexed as

CaregiversChronic DiseaseDecision MakingHealth BehaviorHealth Services AccessibilityHeart FailureHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchRenal Insufficiency, ChronicResilience, PsychologicalSocioeconomic FactorsSystematic Reviews as Topicburden of treatmentend of lifelong-term conditionsmeta-reviewpatient experience

Identifiers

PMID27707824
PMCPMC5073552
OpenAlexW2527895386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.