Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27707802›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Evolutionary Genomics of Peach and Almond Domestication.

Dianne Velasco, Josh Hough, Mallikarjuna Aradhya, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Insights Into the Almond Domestication History.Evolutionary applications · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Combination of Start-Codon-Targeted (SCoT) andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and Evaluation of an AxiomPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The genome of Chinese flowering cherry (Horticulture research · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dianne VelascoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 dmvelasco@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-0630
Josh HoughDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Mallikarjuna AradhyaUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Davis, California 95616.
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-4954
University of California, Davis · USNational Clonal Germplasm Repository · US

Funding

Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domesticated almond [Prunus dulcis (L.) Batsch] and peach [P. persica (Mill.) D. A. Webb] originated on opposite sides of Asia and were independently domesticated ∼5000 yr ago. While interfertile, they possess alternate mating systems and differ in a number of morphological and physiological traits. Here, we evaluated patterns of genome-wide diversity in both almond and peach to better understand the impacts of mating system, adaptation, and domestication on the evolution of these taxa. Almond has around seven times the genetic diversity of peach, and high genome-wide [Formula: see text] values support their status as separate species. We estimated a divergence time of ∼8 MYA (million years ago), coinciding with an active period of uplift in the northeast Tibetan Plateau and subsequent Asian climate change. We see no evidence of a bottleneck during domestication of either species, but identify a number of regions showing signatures of selection during domestication and a significant overlap in candidate regions between peach and almond. While we expected gene expression in fruit to overlap with candidate selected regions, instead we find enrichment for loci highly differentiated between the species, consistent with recent fossil evidence suggesting fruit divergence long preceded domestication. Taken together, this study tells us how closely related tree species evolve and are domesticated, the impact of these events on their genomes, and the utility of genomic information for long-lived species. Further exploration of this data will contribute to the genetic knowledge of these species and provide information regarding targets of selection for breeding application, and further the understanding of evolution in these species.

Indexed as

DomesticationEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantGenomicsGenes, PlantGenetic Association StudiesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationInbreedingMutationPrunus dulcisPrunus persicaQuantitative Trait Locialmonddomesticationmating systempeachPrunus dulcisPrunus persica

Identifiers

PMID27707802
PMCPMC5144968
OpenAlexW2950690505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.