ArticleLancet (London, England)2016
Surgical registries for advancing quality and device surveillance.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.The British journal of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Choice of implant combinations in total hip replacement: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Pooled it
- Mesh-fixation combinations and chronic postoperative inguinal pain after laparoscopic groin hernia repair: nationwide cohort study.BJS open · 2026Article
- Inequalities in Access to Specialist Allergy Services in the United Kingdom: A Report From the BSACI Registry for Immunotherapy (BRIT).Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Article
- Simultaneous incisional hernia repair and colorectal surgery: one or two-step procedure?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- What Is the Most Appropriate Comparator to Use in Assessing the Comparative Performance of Primary Total Knee Prostheses? A Registry-Based Study.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- What is the most appropriate comparator group to use in assessing the performance of primary total hip prostheses within the community?Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2024Article
- Advancing the Real-World Evidence for Medical Devices through Coordinated Registry Networks.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2022Article
- Maturity framework and select approaches for developing Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): Medical Device Epidemiology Network (MDEpiNet) supplement.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2022Article
- The Japan Neurosurgical Database: Statistics Update 2018 and 2019.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2021Article
- Long-term active surveillance of implantable medical devices: an analysis of factors determining whether current registries are adequate to expose safety and efficacy problems.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2019Review
- Lighting a candle.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2019Article
- Active surveillance for implanted devices: strength in numbers.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2019Article
- Generating evidence for new high-risk medical devices.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2019Review
- Bariatric Surgery Registries: Can They Contribute to Improved Outcomes?Current obesity reports · 2017Review
- Incidence of osteosynthesis of members in France.International orthopaedics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27707478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.