Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27706950›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for lung cancer: impact on image quality and registration uncertainty in cone beam CT image guidance.

Mirjana Josipovic, Gitte F Persson, Jens P Bangsgaard, Lena Specht, Marianne C Aznar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Treatment-integrated imaging, radiomics, and personalised radiotherapy: the future is at hand.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent advances in radiation oncology.Ecancermedicalscience · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mirjana Josipovic1 Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-162X
Gitte F Persson1 Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens P Bangsgaard1 Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lena Specht1 Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marianne C Aznar1 Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated the impact of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and tumour baseline shifts on image quality and registration uncertainty in image-guided DIBH radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced lung cancer.

methodsPatients treated with daily cone beam CT (CBCT)-guided free-breathing (FB) RT had an additional CBCT in DIBH at three fractions. These CBCT scans were offline rigidly registered (on tumour) to FB and DIBH CT scans acquired at planning. All registrations were repeated to evaluate the intraobserver uncertainty. CBCT scans were scored on degree of streak artefacts and visualization of tumour and anatomical structures. We examined the impact of tumour baseline shift between consecutive DIBHs on CBCT image quality.

resultsCBCT scans from 15 patients were analysed. Intraobserver image registration uncertainty was approximately 2 mm in both FB and DIBH, except for the craniocaudal direction in FB, where it was >3 mm. On the 31st fraction, the intraobserver uncertainty increased compared with the second fraction. This increase was more pronounced in FB. Image quality scores improved in DIBH compared with FB for all parameters in all patients. Simulated tumour baseline shifts ≤2 mm did not affect the CBCT image quality considerably.

conclusionDIBH CBCT improved image quality and reduced registration uncertainty in the craniocaudal direction in image-guided RT of locally advanced lung cancer. Baseline shifts ≤2 mm in DIBH during CBCT acquisition did not affect image quality. Advances in knowledge: DIBH RT has dosimetric advantages over FB; this work demonstrates an additional benefit of DIBH in terms of registration accuracy because of improved image quality.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingUncertaintyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansLungLung NeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID27706950
PMCPMC5604920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.