Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27706015›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2016

Translation and Linguistic Validation of the Korean Version of the "Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue" Questionnaire for Patients With Overactive Bladder.

Sung Yong Cho, Hahn-Ey Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, Seung-June Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sung Yong ChoDepartment of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-6951
Hahn-Ey LeePfizer Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0686-5622
Seong Jin JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3580-1452
Seung-June OhDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-3539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire from the original version, with subsequent linguistic validation by Korean patients with overactive bladder who undergo active treatment by a physician.

methodsTranslation and linguistic validation were performed in January 2013. The validation process included permission for translation, forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, cognitive debriefing, and proofreading.

resultsDuring the forward translation process, the terms or phrases of 'benefit,' 'willingness,' "have you had any benefit?," "taking all things into account" were adjusted to be more appropriate expressions in the Korean language than those used in the original version. During the backward translation process, no changes were made in terms of the sematic equivalence. In the cognitive debriefing session, 5 patients were asked to fill in the answers within 5 minutes; most reported that the translated questions were clear and easy to understand. One patient felt the questions were a little bit difficult to understand; however, the panel decided not to change the expressions because the overall level of comprehension was high and the translated terms were accurate enough to convey the meaning of the original version of the BSW.

conclusionsThe present study showed a successful linguistic validation of the BSW questionnaire. Further studies are needed to assess of the psychometric properties of the BSW.

Indexed as

LinguisticsPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurverys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27706015
PMCPMC5083833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.