Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27705907›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

The precision relationships between eight GWAS-identified genetic variants and breast cancer in a Chinese population.

Yazhen Chen, Fangmeng Fu, Yuxiang Lin, Lin Qiu, Minjun Lu, Jiantang Zhang, Wei Qiu, Peidong Yang, Na Wu, Meng Huang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yazhen ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Fangmeng FuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Yuxiang LinDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Lin QiuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Minjun LuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Jiantang ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Wei QiuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Peidong YangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Na WuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Meng HuangFujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.
Chuan WangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some of the new breast cancer susceptibility loci discovered in recent Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have not been confirmed in Chinese populations. To determine whether eight novel Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) have associations with breast cancer risk in women from southeast China, we conducted a case-control study of 1,156 breast cancer patients and 1,256 healthy controls. We first validated that the SNPs rs12922061, rs2290203, and rs2981578 were associated with overall breast cancer risk in southeast Chinese women, with the per-allele OR of 1.209 (95%CI: 1.064-1.372), 1.176 (95%CI: 1.048-1.320), and 0.852 (95%CI: 0.759-0.956), respectively. Rs12922061 and rs2290203 even passed the threshold for Bonferroni correction (P value: 0.00625). In stratified analysis, we found another three SNPs were significantly associated within different subgroups. However, after Bonferroni correction (P value: 0.000446), there were no statistically significant was observed. In gene-environment interaction analysis, we observed gene-environment interactions played a potential role of in the risk of breast cancer. These findings provide new insight into the associations between the genetic susceptibility and fine classifications of breast cancer. Based on these results, we encourage further large series studies and functional research to confirm these finding.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyAllelesBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChinaFemaleGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation SurveillanceRisk Factorsbreast cancergene-environment interaction analysisGWASSNPstratified analysis

Identifiers

PMID27705907
PMCPMC5342752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.