ArticleBiophysical journal2016
Semiclosed Conformations of the Ligand-Binding Domains of NMDA Receptors during Stationary Gating.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct Regulation of Early Trafficking of the NMDA Receptors by the Ligand-Binding Domains of the GluN1 and GluN2A Subunits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Evaluation of allosteric N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor modulation by GluN2A-selective antagonists using pharmacological equilibrium modeling.Molecular pharmacology · 2025Article
- Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.Pharmacological reviews · 2021Review
- NMDA Receptor Opening and Closing-Transitions of a Molecular Machine Revealed by Molecular Dynamics.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Computer Simulations Predict High Structural Heterogeneity of Functional State of NMDA Receptors.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Glutamate and Glycine Binding to the NMDA Receptor.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2018Article
- Kinetic models for activation and modulation of NMDA receptor subtypes.Current opinion in physiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Energetics of Glutamate Binding to an Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2017Article
- Probing the Structural Dynamics of the NMDA Receptor Activation by Coarse-Grained Modeling.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Gating Motions and Stationary Gating Properties of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors: Computation Meets Electrophysiology.Accounts of chemical research · 2017Review
- Allosteric Interactions between NMDA Receptor Subunits Shape the Developmental Shift in Channel Properties.Neuron · 2017Article
- Computationally Discovered Potentiating Role of Glycans on NMDA Receptors.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- NMDA receptors: linking physiological output to biophysical operation.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2017Review
- Advancing NMDA Receptor Physiology by Integrating Multiple Approaches.Trends in neurosciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
NMDA receptors are tetrameric ligand-gated ion channels. In the continuous presence of saturating agonists, NMDA receptors undergo stationary gating, in which the channel stochastically switches between an open state that permits ion conductance and a closed state that prevents permeation. The ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of the four subunits are expected to have closed clefts in the channel-open state. On the other hand, there is little knowledge about the conformational status of the LBDs in the channel-closed state during stationary gating. To probe the latter conformational status, Kussius and Popescu engineered interlobe disulfide cross-links in NMDA receptors and found that the cross-linking produced stationary gating kinetics that differed only subtly from that produced by agonist binding. These authors assumed that the cross-linking immobilized the LBDs in cleft-closed conformations, and consequently concluded that throughout stationary gating, agonist-bound LBDs also stayed predominantly in cleft-closed conformations and made only infrequent excursions to cleft-open conformations. Here, by calculating the conformational free energies of cross-linked and agonist-bound LBDs, we assess whether cross-linking actually traps the LBDs in cleft-closed conformations and delineate semiclosed conformations of agonist-bound LBDs that may potentially be thermodynamically and kinetically important during stationary gating. Our free-energy results show that the cross-linked LBDs are not locked in the fully closed form; rather, they sample semiclosed conformations almost as readily as the agonist-bound LBDs. Several lines of reasoning suggest that LBDs are semiclosed in the channel-closed state during stationary gating. Our free-energy simulations suggest possible structural details of such semiclosed LBD conformations, including intra- and intermolecular interactions that serve as alternatives to those in the cleft-closed conformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.