Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27705765›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Semiclosed Conformations of the Ligand-Binding Domains of NMDA Receptors during Stationary Gating.

Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct Regulation of Early Trafficking of the NMDA Receptors by the Ligand-Binding Domains of the GluN1 and GluN2A Subunits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Glutamate and Glycine Binding to the NMDA Receptor.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian DaiDepartment of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Huan-Xiang ZhouDepartment of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. Electronic address: hzhou4@fsu.edu.
Florida State University · US

Funding

Quantitative, Mechanistic Studies of Biomolecular RecognitionR35GM118091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Huan-Xiang Zhou · 2016 to 2026
$6.5M
THEORY OF PROTEIN/PROTEIN ASSOCIATIONR01GM058187 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, HUAN-XIANG · 1998 to 2016
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058187NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA receptors are tetrameric ligand-gated ion channels. In the continuous presence of saturating agonists, NMDA receptors undergo stationary gating, in which the channel stochastically switches between an open state that permits ion conductance and a closed state that prevents permeation. The ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of the four subunits are expected to have closed clefts in the channel-open state. On the other hand, there is little knowledge about the conformational status of the LBDs in the channel-closed state during stationary gating. To probe the latter conformational status, Kussius and Popescu engineered interlobe disulfide cross-links in NMDA receptors and found that the cross-linking produced stationary gating kinetics that differed only subtly from that produced by agonist binding. These authors assumed that the cross-linking immobilized the LBDs in cleft-closed conformations, and consequently concluded that throughout stationary gating, agonist-bound LBDs also stayed predominantly in cleft-closed conformations and made only infrequent excursions to cleft-open conformations. Here, by calculating the conformational free energies of cross-linked and agonist-bound LBDs, we assess whether cross-linking actually traps the LBDs in cleft-closed conformations and delineate semiclosed conformations of agonist-bound LBDs that may potentially be thermodynamically and kinetically important during stationary gating. Our free-energy results show that the cross-linked LBDs are not locked in the fully closed form; rather, they sample semiclosed conformations almost as readily as the agonist-bound LBDs. Several lines of reasoning suggest that LBDs are semiclosed in the channel-closed state during stationary gating. Our free-energy simulations suggest possible structural details of such semiclosed LBD conformations, including intra- and intermolecular interactions that serve as alternatives to those in the cleft-closed conformations.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer SimulationHydrogen BondingKineticsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateThermodynamicsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID27705765
PMCPMC5052434
OpenAlexW2528271853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.