Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27704555›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2017

The effects of cold water immersion and active recovery on inflammation and cell stress responses in human skeletal muscle after resistance exercise.

Jonathan M Peake, Llion A Roberts, Vandre C Figueiredo, Ingrid Egner, Simone Krog, Sigve N Aas, Katsuhiko Suzuki, James F Markworth, Jeff S Coombes, David Cameron-Smith and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07045129 (Thermal Therapies in the Treatment of Muscle Injuries), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07045129 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Thermal Therapies in the Treatment of Muscle Injuries

TypeinterventionalSponsorAspetarRan2025 to 2028Enrolled135ConditionsHamstring Injuries, Hamstring Muscle Repair, Hamstring Muscles, Hamstring RuptureArmsCold water immersion, Hot water immersion, Physiotherapy only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonathan M PeakeSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Llion A RobertsCentre of Excellence for Applied Sport Science Research, Queensland Academy of Sport, Brisbane, Australia.
Vandre C FigueiredoLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ingrid EgnerDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Simone KrogNorwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Sigve N AasNorwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Katsuhiko SuzukiFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.
James F MarkworthLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jeff S CoombesUniversity of Queensland, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Brisbane, Australia.
David Cameron-SmithLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Truls RaastadNorwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Auckland · NZQueensland Academy of Sport · AUUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Queensland · AUWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsCold water immersion and active recovery are common post-exercise recovery treatments. A key assumption about the benefits of cold water immersion is that it reduces inflammation in skeletal muscle. However, no data are available from humans to support this notion. We compared the effects of cold water immersion and active recovery on inflammatory and cellular stress responses in skeletal muscle from exercise-trained men 2, 24 and 48 h during recovery after acute resistance exercise. Exercise led to the infiltration of inflammatory cells, with increased mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophins, and the subcellular translocation of heat shock proteins in muscle. These responses did not differ significantly between cold water immersion and active recovery. Our results suggest that cold water immersion is no more effective than active recovery for minimizing the inflammatory and stress responses in muscle after resistance exercise. ABSTRACT: Cold water immersion and active recovery are common post-exercise recovery treatments. However, little is known about whether these treatments influence inflammation and cellular stress in human skeletal muscle after exercise. We compared the effects of cold water immersion versus active recovery on inflammatory cells, pro-inflammatory cytokines, neurotrophins and heat shock proteins (HSPs) in skeletal muscle after intense resistance exercise. Nine active men performed unilateral lower-body resistance exercise on separate days, at least 1 week apart. On one day, they immersed their lower body in cold water (10°C) for 10 min after exercise. On the other day, they cycled at a low intensity for 10 min after exercise. Muscle biopsies were collected from the exercised leg before, 2, 24 and 48 h after exercise in both trials. Exercise increased intramuscular neutrophil and macrophage counts, MAC1 and CD163 mRNA expression (P < 0.05). Exercise also increased IL1β, TNF, IL6, CCL2, CCL4, CXCL2, IL8 and LIF mRNA expression (P < 0.05). As evidence of hyperalgesia, the expression of NGF and GDNF mRNA increased after exercise (P < 0.05). The cytosolic protein content of αB-crystallin and HSP70 decreased after exercise (P < 0.05). This response was accompanied by increases in the cytoskeletal protein content of αB-crystallin and the percentage of type II fibres stained for αB-crystallin. Changes in inflammatory cells, cytokines, neurotrophins and HSPs did not differ significantly between the recovery treatments. These findings indicate that cold water immersion is no more effective than active recovery for reducing inflammation or cellular stress in muscle after a bout of resistance exercise.

Indexed as

CryotherapyImmersionResistance TrainingWaterAdultCold TemperatureCytokinesHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansInflammationMaleMuscle, SkeletalNerve Growth FactorsNeutrophil InfiltrationRNA, MessengerStress, PhysiologicalCytokinesHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsNerve Growth FactorsRNA, MessengerWatercryotherapycytokinesinflammationmacrophagesneutrophilsrecovery

Identifiers

PMID27704555
PMCPMC5285720
OpenAlexW2529546134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.