Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27704488›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016

Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study.

Anahita Rouzé, Julien De Jonckheere, Farid Zerimech, Julien Labreuche, Erika Parmentier-Decrucq, Benoit Voisin, Emmanuelle Jaillette, Patrice Maboudou, Malika Balduyck, Saad Nseir

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01965821 (Impact of Mallinckrodt Electronic Device on Continuous Control of Tracheal Cuff Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01965821 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Mallinckrodt Electronic Device on Continuous Control of Tracheal Cuff Pressure

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LilleRan2013 to 2014Enrolled18ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsContinuous control of Pcuff followed by manual control, Manual control of Pcuff followed by continuous control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anahita RouzéCentre de Réanimation, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Julien De JonckheereCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Farid ZerimechCentre de Biologie et de Pathologie, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Julien LabreucheEA 2694 - Santé publique : épidémiologie et qualité des soins, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Erika Parmentier-DecrucqCentre de Réanimation, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Benoit VoisinCentre de Réanimation, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Emmanuelle JailletteCentre de Réanimation, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Patrice MaboudouCentre de Biologie et de Pathologie, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Malika BalduyckCentre de Biologie et de Pathologie, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Saad NseirCentre de Réanimation, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France. s-nseir@chru-lille.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P

methodsEighteen patients requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this prospective randomized controlled crossover study. They randomly received either continuous control of P

resultsClinical characteristics were similar during the two study periods, as well as mean airway pressure. Percentage of time spent with cuff overinflation or underinflation was significantly lower during continuous control compared with routine care period [median (IQR) 0.8 (0.1, 2) vs 20.9 (3.1, 40.1), p = 0.0009]. No significant difference was found in pepsin [median (IQR) 230 (151, 300) vs 259 (134, 368), p = 0.95] or in alpha amylase level [median (IQR) 1475 (528, 10,333) vs 2400 (1342, 15,391), p = 0.19] between continuous control and routine care periods, respectively.

conclusionsThe electronic device is efficient in controlling P

Indexed as

ComplicationsIntubationMechanical ventilationMicroaspirationTracheal cuff

Identifiers

PMID27704488
PMCPMC5050178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.