Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27704305›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017

Health-related quality of life in patients with serious non-specific symptoms undergoing evaluation for possible cancer and their experience during the process: a mixed methods study.

E Moseholm, S Rydahl-Hansen, B Ø Lindhardt, M D Fetters

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E MoseholmDepartment of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Nordsjælland, Dyrehavevej 29, Building 10, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark. elar0073@regionh.dk.
S Rydahl-HansenResearch Unit of Clinical Nursing, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 20E, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
B Ø LindhardtDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Department 144, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
M D FettersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this research was to measure changes in HRQoL during the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with non-specific symptoms possibly attributable to cancer, to describe their experiences of HRQoL and to merge these findings with intent to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of their HRQoL experience during this stressful life event.

methodsA convergent mixed methods (MM) design was used and involved quantitative data about HRQoL measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument and qualitative interview data about patients' HRQoL experiences. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire prior to and after evaluation. The baseline questionnaire informed the purposive sampling for the qualitative interview study, and open-end questions matched to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 constructs were used in the semi-structured interviews.

resultsA total of 838 patients were enrolled in the quantitative study; 680 (81 %) also completed follow-up. Twenty-one patients participated in interviews. The MM findings are the meta-inferences drawn by looking across the matched quantitative and qualitative findings: physical function, social function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function, symptoms and quality of life.

conclusionThe survey results illustrate that HRQoL improved over time and the qualitative findings confirmed and further expanded the survey results. The MM analysis underlines that the HRQoL experience cannot be observed independently from context. Participants adapted to their situation over time, and this may change their perceptions of HRQoL. These findings can be used to enhance evidence-based care as clinicians need to be aware of how the context influences the HRQoL experience.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStress, PsychologicalAgedData Interpretation, StatisticalDenmarkFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer diagnosisHealth-related quality of lifeMixed methods researchPre-diagnosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.