Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27704274›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017

Risk-adjusted treatment selection and outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis.

J I González-Muñoz, G Franch-Arcas, M Angoso-Clavijo, M Sánchez-Hernández, A García-Plaza, M Caraballo-Angeli, L Muñoz-Bellvís

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J I González-MuñozDepartment of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 88-132, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. jigonzalezm@saludcastillayleon.es.
G Franch-ArcasDepartment of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 88-132, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
M Angoso-ClavijoDepartment of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 88-132, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
M Sánchez-HernándezDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
A García-PlazaDepartment of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 88-132, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
M Caraballo-AngeliDepartment of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 88-132, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
L Muñoz-BellvísDepartment of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 88-132, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAge and comorbidities increase the surgical risk for patients with acute cholecystitis and impact on the initial treatment selection. The aim of this article is the implementation of objective risk criteria that may be used to select the most appropriate treatment.

methodsWe carried out a prospective cohort study of all patients who were admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis during 2014. They were initially allocated to three different treatment groups according to cholecystitis grade, number of days from clinical onset, and surgical risk scores as follows: immediate surgery by sepsis (EmergS), early surgery (EarlyS), or medical treatment group (MedT). Differences in the outcomes between the treatment groups were evaluated using bivariate and logistic regression analyses.

resultsA total of 149 patients were admitted; 44 % were >80 years old and 40 % were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) > II. The mortality rate of the series was 0 % in EarlyS, 17 % in MedT, and 19 % in EmergS. The mortality rate was significantly associated with a higher degree of cholecystitis, age, and worse score values in risk scales and Charlson index. Logistic regression identified that the only independent predictors of death at the time of admission were the degree of cholecystitis (OR 2.87, p = 0.018) and the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) score (OR 1.14, p = 0.001).

conclusionThe evaluation for the initial treatment in acute cholecystitis should include a systematic determination of the degree of cholecystitis and a surgical risk assessment. Tokyo guideline recommendations should be reviewed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystectomyCholecystitis, AcuteFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisSurgical riskTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.