ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017
Risk-adjusted treatment selection and outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy and lithotripsy for managing acute calculous cholecystitis in non-surgical candidates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Age Is Not So Important for Risk Stratification in Early Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRiMACC Study Database.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Abnormal blood glucose on admission and outcomes in older patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- Outcome prediction after emergency cholecystectomy: performance evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator and the 5-item modified frailty index.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Might simple peripheral blood parameters be an early indicator in the prediction of severity and morbidity of cholecystitis?Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Observational
- Acute Cholecystitis from Biliary Lithiasis: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo Guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Article
- Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in a nationwide Danish cohort.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019Article
- Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Review
- The i-EUS consensus on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: A 3-step modified Delphi approach.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Can we predict severity of acute cholecystitis at admission?Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAge and comorbidities increase the surgical risk for patients with acute cholecystitis and impact on the initial treatment selection. The aim of this article is the implementation of objective risk criteria that may be used to select the most appropriate treatment.
methodsWe carried out a prospective cohort study of all patients who were admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis during 2014. They were initially allocated to three different treatment groups according to cholecystitis grade, number of days from clinical onset, and surgical risk scores as follows: immediate surgery by sepsis (EmergS), early surgery (EarlyS), or medical treatment group (MedT). Differences in the outcomes between the treatment groups were evaluated using bivariate and logistic regression analyses.
resultsA total of 149 patients were admitted; 44 % were >80 years old and 40 % were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) > II. The mortality rate of the series was 0 % in EarlyS, 17 % in MedT, and 19 % in EmergS. The mortality rate was significantly associated with a higher degree of cholecystitis, age, and worse score values in risk scales and Charlson index. Logistic regression identified that the only independent predictors of death at the time of admission were the degree of cholecystitis (OR 2.87, p = 0.018) and the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) score (OR 1.14, p = 0.001).
conclusionThe evaluation for the initial treatment in acute cholecystitis should include a systematic determination of the degree of cholecystitis and a surgical risk assessment. Tokyo guideline recommendations should be reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27704274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.