ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2016
Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on eligibility for and frequency of breast conservation in stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer: surgical results of CALGB 40601 (Alliance).
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Curative effect of immediate reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Shrinkage Mode After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancers: Association With Hormonal Receptor.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- De-Escalation of Neoadjuvant Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Intraoperative and Perioperative Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical breast cancer · 2026Article
- What are the determinants of type of breast surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy? An analysis of breast cancer patients among Italian SENONET centers: NEOIMPACT study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Observational
- Predictors of Nodal Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- An Overview of the Importance of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer Patients: From the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society of Breast Surgeons.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Optimizing Outcomes in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of routine FDG-PET/CT on locoregional treatment decisions in breast cancer patients receiving preoperative systemic therapy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Clinical prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer: a machine learning study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Patterns of response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to molecular subtype.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Italy: A Senonetwork analysis of 37,215 patients treated from 2017 to 2022.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2024Article
- Impact of Margin Status on Local Recurrence in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Shifting the Paradigm: The Transformative Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- iGenSig-Rx: an integral genomic signature based white-box tool for modeling cancer therapeutic responses using multi-omics data.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Is neoadjuvant chemotherapy necessary for T2N0-1M0 hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Breast surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024Review
- iGenSig-Rx: an integral genomic signature based white-box tool for modeling cancer therapeutic responses using multi-omics data.Research square · 2023Article
- An Innovative Scoring System to Select the Optimal Surgery in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIt had been previously shown that patients who receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are more likely to undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) than those who have primary surgery. However, the frequency with which patients who are not BCT-eligible prior to NST convert to BCT-eligible with treatment is unknown. To document this conversion rate in a subset of patients expected to have a high clinical response rate to NST, we studied surgical assessment and management of patients enrolled on a randomized neoadjuvant trial for stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC)(CALGB 40601).
methodsThe treating surgeon assessed BCT candidacy based on clinico-radiographic criteria both before and after NST. Definitive breast surgical management was at surgeon and patient discretion. We sought to determine (1) the conversion rate from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible (2) the percentage of BCT-eligible patients who chose breast conservation, and (3) the rate of successful BCT. We also evaluated surgeon-determined factors for BCT-ineligibility and the correlation between BCT eligibility and pathologic complete response (pCR).
resultsOf 292 patients with pre- and post-NST surgical assessments, 59 % were non-BCT candidates at baseline. Of the 43 % of these patients who converted with NST, 67 % opted for BCT, with an 80 % success rate. NST increased the BCT-eligible rate from 41 to 64 %. Common factors cited for BCT-ineligibility prior to NST including tumor size (56 %) and probable poor cosmetic outcome (26 %) were reduced by 67 and 75 %, respectively, with treatment, while multicentricity, the second most common factor (33 %), fell by only 16 %. Since 23 % of the BCT-eligible patients chose mastectomy, BCT was the final surgical procedure in just 40 % of the patients. Patients considered BCT-eligible both at baseline and after NST had a pCR rate of 55 %, while patients who were BCT-ineligible prior to NST had the same pCR rate (44 %) whether they converted to BCT-eligible or not.
conclusionsMany patients with HER2 + BC deemed ineligible for BCT at baseline can be converted to BCT-eligible with NST; excluding patients with multicentric disease substantially increases that percentage. In converted patients who opt for BCT, the success rate is similar to that of patients considered BCT-eligible at baseline. Whether a BCT-ineligible patient converts to BCT eligibility or not does not appear to affect the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Despite the efficacy of NST in this patient cohort, only 40 % of patients had successful BCT; further research into why BCT-eligible patients often opt for mastectomy is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.