Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27704226›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2016

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on eligibility for and frequency of breast conservation in stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer: surgical results of CALGB 40601 (Alliance).

Mehra Golshan, Constance T Cirrincione, William M Sikov, Lisa A Carey, Donald A Berry, Beth Overmoyer, Nora L Henry, George Somlo, Elisa Port, Harold J Burstein and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Breast surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Mehra GolshanDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. mgolshan@partners.org.
Constance T CirrincioneAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
William M SikovProgram in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Lisa A CareyDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Donald A BerryAlliance Statistics and Data Center, M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Beth OvermoyerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Nora L HenryDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
George SomloDepartment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elisa PortDepartment of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Harold J BursteinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Clifford HudisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eric WinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
David W OllilaDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USDuke Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWomen & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
Huntsman Cancer Institute/ University of Utah Network Lead Academic Participating Site ApplicationUG1CA233178 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Matthew Poppe, Heloisa Prado Soares · 2019 to 2026
$4.9M
UM LAPs- U10 GrantU10CA180801 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZALUPSKI, MARK M · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
Huntsman Cancer Institute/Univ of Utah Network Lead Academic Participating SiteU10CA180818 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GAFFNEY, DAVID K · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Sites ApplicationU10CA180838 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180801NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180818NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180838NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt had been previously shown that patients who receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are more likely to undergo breast-conserving therapy (BCT) than those who have primary surgery. However, the frequency with which patients who are not BCT-eligible prior to NST convert to BCT-eligible with treatment is unknown. To document this conversion rate in a subset of patients expected to have a high clinical response rate to NST, we studied surgical assessment and management of patients enrolled on a randomized neoadjuvant trial for stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC)(CALGB 40601).

methodsThe treating surgeon assessed BCT candidacy based on clinico-radiographic criteria both before and after NST. Definitive breast surgical management was at surgeon and patient discretion. We sought to determine (1) the conversion rate from BCT-ineligible to BCT-eligible (2) the percentage of BCT-eligible patients who chose breast conservation, and (3) the rate of successful BCT. We also evaluated surgeon-determined factors for BCT-ineligibility and the correlation between BCT eligibility and pathologic complete response (pCR).

resultsOf 292 patients with pre- and post-NST surgical assessments, 59 % were non-BCT candidates at baseline. Of the 43 % of these patients who converted with NST, 67 % opted for BCT, with an 80 % success rate. NST increased the BCT-eligible rate from 41 to 64 %. Common factors cited for BCT-ineligibility prior to NST including tumor size (56 %) and probable poor cosmetic outcome (26 %) were reduced by 67 and 75 %, respectively, with treatment, while multicentricity, the second most common factor (33 %), fell by only 16 %. Since 23 % of the BCT-eligible patients chose mastectomy, BCT was the final surgical procedure in just 40 % of the patients. Patients considered BCT-eligible both at baseline and after NST had a pCR rate of 55 %, while patients who were BCT-ineligible prior to NST had the same pCR rate (44 %) whether they converted to BCT-eligible or not.

conclusionsMany patients with HER2 + BC deemed ineligible for BCT at baseline can be converted to BCT-eligible with NST; excluding patients with multicentric disease substantially increases that percentage. In converted patients who opt for BCT, the success rate is similar to that of patients considered BCT-eligible at baseline. Whether a BCT-ineligible patient converts to BCT eligibility or not does not appear to affect the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Despite the efficacy of NST in this patient cohort, only 40 % of patients had successful BCT; further research into why BCT-eligible patients often opt for mastectomy is needed.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast conserving therapyHER2-positive breast cancerNeoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID27704226
PMCPMC5189982
OpenAlexW2527710791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.