Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27704164›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2017

Human multipotent adult progenitor cells enhance islet function and revascularisation when co-transplanted as a composite pellet in a mouse model of diabetes.

João Paulo M C M Cunha, Gunter Leuckx, Peter Sterkendries, Hannelie Korf, Gabriela Bomfim-Ferreira, Lutgart Overbergh, Bart Vaes, Harry Heimberg, Conny Gysemans, Chantal Mathieu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Islet Regeneration: Endogenous and Exogenous Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. An Overview of Engineered Hydrogel-Based Biomaterials for ImprovedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Paulo M C M CunhaLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULEUVEN), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49 bus 902, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Gunter LeuckxBeta cell neogenesis laboratory, Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter SterkendriesReGenesys BVBA, Heverlee, Belgium.
Hannelie KorfLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULEUVEN), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49 bus 902, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Gabriela Bomfim-FerreiraLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULEUVEN), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49 bus 902, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Lutgart OverberghLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULEUVEN), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49 bus 902, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart VaesReGenesys BVBA, Heverlee, Belgium.
Harry HeimbergBeta cell neogenesis laboratory, Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Conny GysemansLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULEUVEN), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49 bus 902, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. conny.gysemans@kuleuven.be.
Chantal MathieuLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULEUVEN), Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49 bus 902, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisHypoxia in the initial days after islet transplantation leads to considerable loss of islet mass and contributes to disappointing outcomes in the clinical setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether co-transplantation of human non-endothelial bone marrow-derived multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs), which are non-immunogenic and can secrete angiogenic growth factors during the initial days after implantation, could improve islet engraftment and survival.

methodsIslets (150) were co-transplanted, with or without human MAPCs (2.5 × 10

resultsHuman MAPCs produced high amounts of angiogenic growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor, in vitro and in vivo, as demonstrated by the induction of neo-angiogenesis in the chorioallantoic membrane assay. Islet-human MAPC co-transplantation as a composite pellet significantly improved the outcome of islet transplantation as measured by the initial glycaemic control, diabetes reversal rate, glucose tolerance and serum C-peptide concentration compared with the outcome following transplantation of islets alone. Histologically, a higher blood vessel area and density in addition to a higher vessel/islet ratio were detected in recipients of islet-human MAPC composites. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThe present data suggest that co-transplantation of mouse pancreatic islets with human MAPCs, which secrete high amounts of angiogenic growth factors, enhance islet graft revascularisation and subsequently improve islet graft function.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBlood GlucoseCells, CulturedDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Disease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansIslets of LangerhansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMiddle AgedNeovascularization, PhysiologicStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationBlood GlucoseIsletRevascularisationStem cellsType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID27704164
PMCPMC6518081
OpenAlexW2529560023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.