Fluoroscopy versus sonography for image guidance in peripheral MSK intervention.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Safety and efficacy of image-guided retrocalcaneal bursa corticosteroid injection for the treatment of retrocalcaneal bursitis.Skeletal radiology · 2021
   Article
2. Ultrasound-guided interventions with augmented reality in situ visualisation: a proof-of-mechanism phantom study.European radiology experimental · 2020
   Article
3. Dose reduction for fluoroscopically guided injections: phantom simulation and patient procedures.Skeletal radiology · 2018
   Article
4. Responses to letters to the editor for "Fluoroscopically guided retrocalcaneal bursa steroid injection: description of the technique and pilot study of short-term patient outcomes".Skeletal radiology · 2017
   Article
5. Sonography and fluoroscopy guidance for percutaneous musculoskeletal procedures.Skeletal radiology · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.