Erratum: Pit- and trench-forming osteoclasts: a distinction that matters.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Prognostic value and biological role of STING-related genes GAB3 and IL16 in lung adenocarcinoma: implications for immune evasion and treatment.Scientific reports · 2025
   Article
2. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade regulates skeletal remodeling in a sex- and age-dependent manner.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
   Article
3. Novel insights into the coupling of osteoclasts and resorption to bone formation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Pit- and trench-forming osteoclasts: a distinction that matters.2015

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract