Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27703777›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2016

The feasibility and effectiveness of Catch It, an innovative CBT smartphone app.

Peter Kinderman, Paul Hagan, Sophie King, James Bowman, Jasprit Chahal, Li Gan, Rebecca McKnight, Charlotte Waldon, Matthew Smith, John Gilbertson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Better care through better use of data in GP-patient partnerships.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter Kinderman, MA, MSc, PhD, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Paul Hagan, BA, MBA, Computer Services, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sophie King, BSc, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
James Bowman, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jasprit Chahal, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Li Gan, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rebecca McKnight, BA, MA, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Charlotte Waldon, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Matthew Smith, BA, Computer Services, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John Gilbertson, BSc, Computer Services, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sara Tai, BA, MSc, D.Clin.Psy, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe widespread use of smartphones makes effective therapies such as cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) potentially accessible to large numbers of people.

aimsThis paper reports the usage data of the first trial of Catch It, a new CBT smartphone app.

methodUptake and usage rates, fidelity of user responses to CBT principles, and impact on reported negative and positive moods were assessed.

resultsA relatively modest proportion of people chose to download the app. Once used, the app tended to be used more than once, and 84% of the user-generated content was consistent with the basic concepts of CBT. There were statistically significant reductions in negative mood intensity and increases in positive mood intensity.

conclusionsSmartphone apps have potential beneficial effects in mental health through the application of basic CBT principles. More research with randomised controlled trial designs should be conducted. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence.

Identifiers

PMID27703777
PMCPMC4995173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.