Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27703627›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2016

Pretreatmet with 5% lidocaine patch reduces cannula-induced and propofol-induced pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Jung-Min Hong, Hyeon Jeong Lee, Ah Reum Cho, Ji Seok Baik, Do Won Lee, Young Tae Ji, Ki Chan Yoo, Hae-Kyu Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jung-Min HongDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Hyeon Jeong LeeDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ah Reum ChoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ji Seok BaikDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Do Won LeeDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Young Tae JiDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Ki Chan YooDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Hae-Kyu KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Pusan National University Hospital · KRPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of 5% lidocaine patch in reducing propofol-induced pain and cannula-induced pain.

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind study, 126 patients were divided into one of three groups: pretreatment with a 5% lidocaine patch (Lidotop®) and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group A); pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group B); or pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of 2% lidocaine (40 mg) with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group C) for induction of anesthesia. Pain severity was evaluated on a four-point verbal rating scale during intravenous cannulation, propofol injection, and 24 h after the operation (recall).

resultsEighteen patients (47.4%) in Group A complained of cannula-induced pain compared with 35 (94.6%) in Group B and 36 (94.7%) in Group C (P < 0.001). Group A patients showed significantly lower incidence of propofol-induced pain and recall of propofol-induced pain compared with Group B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01), whereas there was no difference compared with Group C.

conclusionsPreoperative transdermal administration of 5% lidocaine patch is an effective and simple method in reducing propofol-induced pain as well as cannula-induced pain.

Indexed as

Cutaneous administrationLidocainePainPropofol

Identifiers

PMID27703627
PMCPMC5047982
OpenAlexW2496916340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.