Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27703568›Full record

ArticleOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences2016

Clinical, Laboratory and Radiographic Features of Patients with Pneumonia and Parapneumonic Effusions.

Sanja Petrusevska-Marinkovic, Irena Kondova-Topuzovska, Zvonko Milenkovic, Goran Kondov, Ankica Anastasovska

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanja Petrusevska-MarinkovicUniversity Infectious Diseases Clinic, Medical Faculty, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Irena Kondova-TopuzovskaUniversity Infectious Diseases Clinic, Medical Faculty, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Zvonko MilenkovicUniversity Infectious Diseases Clinic, Medical Faculty, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Goran KondovUniversity Thoracocardiovascular Surgery Clinic, Medical Faculty, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Ankica AnastasovskaUniversity Infectious Diseases Clinic, Medical Faculty, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje · MK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParapneumonic effusions complicating pneumonia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

aimTo determine the role of the clinical, laboratory and radiographic features to the differential diagnosis of patients with community- acquired pneumonia (CAP) without effusion, uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UCPPE) and complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE). MATERIAL AND

methodsWe analysed 148 patients with CAP without effusion, 50 with UCPPE and 44 with CPPE. In three groups of patients, the majority was male patients (58.11%, 58%, 61.36%) consequently.

resultsThe chronic heart failure was the most common comorbidity in a group with CAP (28; 18.92%) and UCPPE (7; 14%), alcoholism (12;12.77%) in a group with CPPE. Patients with CPPE had significantly longer fever compared to patients with CAP without effusion (p = 0.003). Pleuritic chest pain (86.36%) and dyspnea (88.64%) were the most common symptoms in CPPE, then to group with UCPPE (60%; 52%), and in CAP without effusion (25.68%; 47,97%). Diffuse pulmonary changes were detected more frequently in the group with CAP without effusion compared with the group with CPPE (64.86 % vs. 27.27 %), while the segment lung changes were more common in patients with CPPE (50% vs. 20.27%). Patients with CPPE were significant with higher erythrocytes sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cells (WBC) and serum C- reactive protein (CRP) than it the other two groups (p = 0.00090, p = 0.01, p= 0.000065).

conclusionProper analysis of clinical, laboratory and radiographic features of patients with CAP and parapneumonic effusion can prevent mismanagement in these patients and will reduce morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

clinical featurescommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP)empyemalaboratory featuresparapneumonic effusionradiographic features

Identifiers

PMID27703568
PMCPMC5042628
OpenAlexW2511314028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.