Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27703330›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2016

Comparisons of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine besylate/losartan and amlodipine camsylate/losartan in healthy subjects: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study.

YoonJung Choi, SeungHwan Lee, Sang-Min Cho, Won-Ho Kang, Kyu-Yeol Nam, In-Jin Jang, Kyung-Sang Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

YoonJung ChoiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
SeungHwan LeeClinical Trials Center, Seoul National University Hospital.
Sang-Min ChoResearch Institute.
Won-Ho KangResearch Institute.
Kyu-Yeol NamGlobal R&D, Korea United Pharm Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In-Jin JangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
Kyung-Sang YuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
Seoul National University · KRKorea Pharma (South Korea) · KRNew Generation University College · ETSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fixed-dose combination (FDC) of amlodipine and losartan has been used to reduce blood pressure in patients whose hypertension is not sufficiently controlled with either drug alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and tolerability of an FDC of 6.94 mg amlodipine besylate (5 mg as amlodipine)/50 mg losartan potassium compared to an FDC of 5 mg amlodipine camsylate/50 mg losartan potassium in healthy subjects. SUBJECTS AND

methodsA randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study was conducted on 46 healthy male subjects. Blood concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours post dose for each period. PK parameters were calculated in each treatment group using a noncompartmental method. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the two treatments for the maximum plasma concentration (

resultsThe PK profiles of the two treatments were similar. For amlodipine, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of amlodipine besylate to amlodipine camsylate for the

conclusionAn FDC of 6.94 mg amlodipine besylate (5 mg as amlodipine)/50 mg losartan potassium produced similar results to an FDC of 5 mg amlodipine camsylate/50 mg losartan potassium treatment with respect to the PK parameters of amlodipine and losartan based on

Indexed as

Administration, OralAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDose-Response Relationship, DrugHalf-LifeHealthy VolunteersHumansLosartanAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersLosartanamlodipinecomparative pharmacokineticsdrug developmentlosartan

Identifiers

PMID27703330
PMCPMC5036556
OpenAlexW2521467913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.