Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27703324›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Preservative-free bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination in patients with glaucoma in clinical practice.

Stefan Pfennigsdorf, Peter Eschstruth, Stefan Häsemeyer, Cord Feuerhake, Gerrett Brief, Ioana Grobeiu, Andrew Shirlaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01999348 (A Study of GANFORT® UD in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01999348 completednot on this map

A Study of GANFORT® UD in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OHT) in a Medical Setting

TypeobservationalSponsorAllerganRan2013 to 2014Enrolled1,553ConditionsGlaucoma, Primary Open Angle, Ocular HypertensionArmsFixed Combination Bimatoprost and Timolol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan PfennigsdorfPolch Ophthalmology Practice, Polch.
Peter EschstruthOphthalmology Practice, Kiel.
Stefan HäsemeyerOphthalmology Practice, Wiesloch.
Cord FeuerhakeOphthalmology Practice, Lehrte.
Gerrett BriefOphthalmology Practice, Dortmund, Germany.
Ioana GrobeiuAllergan Holdings Ltd., Marlow, UK.
Andrew ShirlawAllergan Holdings Ltd., Marlow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of, and compliance to, preservative-free (PF), fixed-combination (FC) bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in a clinical practice setting. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis open-label study observed patients switched to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% due to insufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) control on previous therapies. IOP was measured at baseline and at ~12 weeks. Tolerability and continuation of therapy were also assessed.

resultsA total of 1,553 patients were included in the study, and the per-protocol population comprised 1,391 patients. There were some minor deviations from protocol: some patients with no prior therapy and some who switched for reasons other than insufficient IOP control were included in the analysis. The mean IOP was reduced by 27.4%, from 22.2 mmHg to 16.1 mmHg. In subgroup analyses, the mean IOP was significantly reduced from baseline, irrespective of whether previous treatment was monotherapy or combination therapy, and preserved or PF therapy. Physicians mostly (88.1%) reported the IOP-lowering efficacy of PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% to be as expected or better than expected. Switching to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% resulted in reductions from baseline in the number of patients reporting ocular symptoms. Adverse events were reported by 6.2% of patients, the most common being eye irritation (1.6%) and eye pruritus (1.0%). Physicians reported treatment compliance as better or unchanged compared with prior treatment in almost all patients (93.9%). Most patients were expected to continue PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% after the end of the study.

conclusionSwitching to PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% was associated with significant IOP reductions from baseline over 12 weeks. Adverse events were uncommon, and compliance was high compared with previous therapy. PF FC bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% may be a suitable treatment for patients with inadequately controlled IOP or who are sensitive to preservatives.

Indexed as

bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5%fixed combinationglaucomaintraocular pressurepreservative freeprostaglandin

Identifiers

PMID27703324
PMCPMC5036566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.