Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27703154›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

Local adaptation (mostly) remains local: reassessing environmental associations of climate-related candidate SNPs in Arabidopsis halleri.

C Rellstab, M C Fischer, S Zoller, R Graf, A Tedder, K K Shimizu, A Widmer, R Holderegger, F Gugerli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. European common frog (Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Genomic basis of parallel adaptation varies with divergence inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. AoB PLANTS · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C RellstabBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
M C FischerETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Zürich, Switzerland.
S ZollerETH Zürich, Genetic Diversity Centre, Zürich, Switzerland.
R GrafBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
A TedderInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies and Institute of Plant Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
K K ShimizuInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies and Institute of Plant Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
A WidmerETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Zürich, Switzerland.
R HoldereggerBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
F GugerliBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous landscape genomic studies have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genes potentially involved in local adaptation. Rarely, it has been explicitly evaluated whether these environmental associations also hold true beyond the populations studied. We tested whether putatively adaptive SNPs in Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae), characterized in a previous study investigating local adaptation to a highly heterogeneous environment, show the same environmental associations in an independent, geographically enlarged set of 18 populations. We analysed new SNP data of 444 plants with the same methodology (partial Mantel tests, PMTs) as in the original study and additionally with a latent factor mixed model (LFMM) approach. Of the 74 candidate SNPs, 41% (PMTs) and 51% (LFMM) were associated with environmental factors in the independent data set. However, only 5% (PMTs) and 15% (LFMM) of the associations showed the same environment-allele relationships as in the original study. In total, we found 11 genes (31%) containing the same association in the original and independent data set. These can be considered prime candidate genes for environmental adaptation at a broader geographical scale. Our results suggest that selection pressures in highly heterogeneous alpine environments vary locally and signatures of selection are likely to be population-specific. Thus, genotype-by-environment interactions underlying adaptation are more heterogeneous and complex than is often assumed, which might represent a problem when testing for adaptation at specific loci.

Indexed as

ClimateGene-Environment InteractionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesArabidopsisGenes, PlantGenetics, PopulationGenotypeGeographyLinear ModelsModels, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27703154
PMCPMC5234484
OpenAlexW2529322119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.