Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27702878›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2017

Functional assessment of cerebral artery stenosis: A pilot study based on computational fluid dynamics.

Jia Liu, Zhengzheng Yan, Yuehua Pu, Wen-Shin Shiu, Jianhuang Wu, Rongliang Chen, Xinyi Leng, Haiqiang Qin, Xin Liu, Baixue Jia and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jia Liu1 Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zhengzheng Yan1 Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yuehua Pu2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wen-Shin Shiu1 Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jianhuang Wu1 Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Rongliang Chen1 Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xinyi Leng3 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Haiqiang Qin2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin Liu2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Baixue Jia2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ligang Song2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yilong Wang2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhongrong Miao2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongjun Wang2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liping Liu2 Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Chuan Cai1 Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fractional pressure ratio is introduced to quantitatively assess the hemodynamic significance of severe intracranial stenosis. A computational fluid dynamics-based method is proposed to non-invasively compute the FPR

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyModels, TheoreticalAortaBlood PressureCerebral ArteriesCerebrovascular CirculationComputational BiologyConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansIntracranial ArteriosclerosisMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsStrokeand brain ischemiacerebral blood flowcerebral hemodynamicsmathematical modellingStroke

Identifiers

PMID27702878
PMCPMC5531352
OpenAlexW2529311667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.