ArticleProteins2017
Modeling complexes of modeled proteins.
Article in Proteins, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- GRAMMCell: Docking-based Cell Modeling Resource.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Diffusion of proteins in crowded solutions studied by docking-based modeling.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- Improved Antibody-Specific Epitope Prediction Using AlphaFold and AbAdapt.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022Article
- Article
- AbAdapt: an adaptive approach to predicting antibody-antigen complex structures from sequence.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- DOCKGROUND membrane protein-protein set.PloS one · 2022Article
- Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions.Proteins · 2021Article
- Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins.Proteins · 2020Article
- How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking.Proteins · 2020Article
- Methods for sequence and structural analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Article
- Computational approaches to macromolecular interactions in the cell.Current opinion in structural biology · 2019Review
- Article
- Computational Feasibility of an Exhaustive Search of Side-Chain Conformations in Protein-Protein Docking.Journal of computational chemistry · 2018Article
- Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Modeling CAPRI targets 110-120 by template-based and free docking using contact potential and combined scoring function.Proteins · 2018Article
- Structural quality of unrefined models in protein docking.Proteins · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural characterization of proteins is essential for understanding life processes at the molecular level. However, only a fraction of known proteins have experimentally determined structures. This fraction is even smaller for protein-protein complexes. Thus, structural modeling of protein-protein interactions (docking) primarily has to rely on modeled structures of the individual proteins, which typically are less accurate than the experimentally determined ones. Such "double" modeling is the Grand Challenge of structural reconstruction of the interactome. Yet it remains so far largely untested in a systematic way. We present a comprehensive validation of template-based and free docking on a set of 165 complexes, where each protein model has six levels of structural accuracy, from 1 to 6 Å C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.