Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27701629›Full record

Trial reportLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2016

Dose Schedule and Enhanced Conversational Recast Treatment for Children With Specific Language Impairment.

Christina N Meyers-Denman, Elena Plante

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06250101 (Study 5), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06250101 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study 5: Effects of Semantic Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsLanguage Disorders in ChildrenArmsEnhanced Conversational Recast treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Less Versus More: The Effect of Recast Length in Treatment of Grammatical Errors.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Translating Enhanced Conversational Recast to a Telepractice Setting.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Learning Without Trying: The Clinical Relevance of Statistical Learning.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina N Meyers-DenmanUniversity of Colorado at Boulder.
Elena PlanteUniversity of Arizona.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Colorado System · US

Funding

Treatment delivery methods for children with SLIR21DC014203 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI PLANTE, ELENA M · 2014 to 2015
$377k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Dosage has been identified as an important element of treatment that may affect treatment efficacy. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of dose schedule for treatment of grammatical morphology deficits in children with specific language impairment (SLI). Method: Sixteen 4-to-5-year-old children with SLI participated in a 5-week intervention consisting of equivalent daily Enhanced Conversational Recast treatment (Plante et al., 2014) targeting grammatical morphology. Half of the children received treatment in one 30-min session (massed condition). Half received treatment in three 10-min sessions (spaced condition) within one 4-hr period. Progress was assessed 3 times weekly by probing a child's use of his or her treatment morpheme and untreated morpheme (a maturational control) in untreated contexts. Results: Pre- to posttreatment morpheme usage differed significantly for children regardless of dosage condition, and pre to post usage of an untreated morpheme was unchanged, demonstrating overall treatment efficacy. There were no differences in treatment effects for the massed and spaced conditions. Conclusions: The study adds to evidence that Enhanced Conversational Recast can produce positive results in a short period of time for children with SLI. Furthermore, clinicians may have some flexibility in terms of the dose schedule they use to deliver this treatment in an evidence-based manner.

Indexed as

Child LanguageChild, PreschoolCommunicationFemaleHumansLanguage DisordersLanguage TestsLanguage TherapyMaleSpeech TherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27701629
PMCPMC5345548
OpenAlexW2528632169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.