Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27701623›Full record

Observational studyJAMA2016

Association Between Tracheal Intubation During Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival.

Lars W Andersen, Tia T Raymond, Robert A Berg, Vinay M Nadkarni, Anne V Grossestreuer, Tobias Kurth, Michael W Donnino, American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
30.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lars W AndersenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark3Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tia T RaymondDivision of Cardiac Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical City Children's Hospital, Dallas, Texas.
Robert A BergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania6Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia7Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Vinay M NadkarniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania6Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia7Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Anne V GrossestreuerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia9Now with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tobias KurthInstitute of Public Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael W DonninoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts11Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators
University of Pennsylvania · USAarhus University Hospital · DKBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USMedical City Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Thaimine as an adjunct metabolic resuscitator in cardiac arrestK24HL127101 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DONNINO, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2015 to 2024
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL127101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Tracheal intubation is common during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest, although the relationship between intubation during cardiac arrest and outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine if intubation during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study of data from United States hospitals in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Pediatric patients (<18 years) with index in-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2000 and December 2014 were included. Patients who were receiving assisted ventilation, had an invasive airway in place, or both at the time chest compressions were initiated were excluded. Exposures: Tracheal intubation during cardiac arrest . Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation and neurologic outcome. A favorable neurologic outcome was defined as a score of 1 to 2 on the pediatric cerebral performance category score. Patients being intubated at any given minute were matched with patients at risk of being intubated within the same minute (ie, still receiving resuscitation) based on a time-dependent propensity score calculated from multiple patient, event, and hospital characteristics. Results: The study included 2294 patients; 1308 (57%) were male, and all age groups were represented (median age, 7 months [25th-75th percentiles, 21 days, 4 years]). Of the 2294 included patients, 1555 (68%) were intubated during the cardiac arrest. In the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 2270), survival was lower in those intubated compared with those not intubated (411/1135 [36%] vs 460/1135 [41%]; risk ratio [RR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]; P = .03). There was no significant difference in return of spontaneous circulation (770/1135 [68%] vs 771/1135 [68%]; RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.06]; P = .96) or favorable neurologic outcome (185/987 [19%] vs 211/983 [21%]; RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.75-1.02]; P = .08) between those intubated and not intubated. The association between intubation and decreased survival was observed in the majority of the sensitivity and subgroup analyses, including when accounting for missing data and in a subgroup of patients with a pulse at the beginning of the event. Conclusions and Relevance: Among pediatric patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, tracheal intubation during cardiac arrest compared with no intubation was associated with decreased survival to hospital discharge. Although the study design does not eliminate the potential for confounding, these findings do not support the current emphasis on early tracheal intubation for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdolescentBlood CirculationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHeart ArrestHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntubation, IntratrachealMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePropensity ScoreRegistries

Identifiers

PMID27701623
PMCPMC6080953
OpenAlexW2528843910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.