Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27701450›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Multivariate Analysis of Anthropometric Traits Using Summary Statistics of Genome-Wide Association Studies from GIANT Consortium.

Haeil Park, Xiaoyin Li, Yeunjoo E Song, Karen Y He, Xiaofeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy analysis.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cross-Phenotype Association Analysis Using Summary Statistics from GWAS.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haeil ParkDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-0607
Xiaoyin LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States of America.
Yeunjoo E SongDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7452-3731
Karen Y HeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-7697
Xiaofeng ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States of America.

Funding

BIOMETRIC-GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007567 · NHLBI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI ZHU, XIAOFENG · 1985 to 2021
$6.0M
Statistical methods for analyzing high-throughput genotype dataR01HG003054 · NHGRI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI ZHU, XIAOFENG · 2005 to 2017
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003054NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-analysis of single trait for multiple cohorts has been used for increasing statistical power in genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Although hundreds of variants have been identified by GWAS, these variants only explain a small fraction of phenotypic variation. Cross-phenotype association analysis (CPASSOC) can further improve statistical power by searching for variants that contribute to multiple traits, which is often relevant to pleiotropy. In this study, we performed CPASSOC analysis on the summary statistics from the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium using a novel method recently developed by our group. Sex-specific meta-analysis data for height, body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI) from discovery phase of the GIANT consortium study were combined using CPASSOC for each trait as well as 3 traits together. The conventional meta-analysis results from the discovery phase data of GIANT consortium studies were used to compare with that from CPASSOC analysis. The CPASSOC analysis was able to identify 17 loci associated with anthropometric traits that were missed by conventional meta-analysis. Among these loci, 16 have been reported in literature by including additional samples and 1 is novel. We also demonstrated that CPASSOC is able to detect pleiotropic effects when analyzing multiple traits.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociAnthropometryBody Mass IndexDatabases, GeneticFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisWaist-Hip Ratio

Identifiers

PMID27701450
PMCPMC5049793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.