Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699999›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Outpatient administration of BEAM conditioning prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma is safe, feasible, and cost-effective.

Robin M Reid, Andrea Baran, Jonathan W Friedberg, Gordon L Phillips, Jane L Liesveld, Michael W Becker, Lucy Wedow, Paul M Barr, Laurie A Milner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient High Dose Cytarabine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Brazilian Amazon.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2020
    Article
  5. Cost burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin M ReidJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Andrea BaranJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Jonathan W FriedbergJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Gordon L PhillipsJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Jane L LiesveldJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Michael W BeckerJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Lucy WedowJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Paul M BarrJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Laurie A MilnerJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USUnity Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dose BEAM chemotherapy (BCNU, etoposide, Ara-C, and melphalan) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is frequently used as consolidative therapy for patients with recurrent or refractory Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The BEAM regimen has traditionally been administered over 6 days in the hospital, with patients remaining hospitalized until hematologic recovery and clinical stability. In an effort to reduce the length of hospitalization for these patients, our institution has transitioned from inpatient (IP) to outpatient (OP) administration of BEAM conditioning. Here, we report the results of an analysis of the feasibility, cost, complications, and outcomes for the initial group of patients who received OP BEAM compared to a prior cohort of patients who received IP BEAM. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable for the two cohorts, as were engraftment kinetics. Length of hospital stay was reduced by 6 days for the OP cohort (P < 0.001), resulting in a cost savings of more than $17,000 per patient. Fewer complications occurred in the OP cohort, including severe enteritis (P = 0.01), organ toxicities (P = 0.01), and infections (P = 0.04). Overall survival rate up to 3 years posttransplant was better for the OP cohort (P = 0.02), likely due to differences in posttransplant therapies. We conclude that OP administration of BEAM conditioning is safe and may offer significant advantages, including decreased length of hospitalization, reduced costs, decreased risks for severe toxicities and infectious complications, and likely improvement in patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarmustineCombined Modality TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisCytarabineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansInfectionsKaplan-Meier EstimateCarmustineCytarabineMelphalanPodophyllotoxinComplicationsconditioning chemotherapycoststem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID27699999
PMCPMC5119960
OpenAlexW2530531655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.