Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699893›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2016

Mapping the interactions of adenoviral E1A proteins with the p160 nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain of CBP.

Peter Haberz, Munehito Arai, Maria A Martinez-Yamout, H Jane Dyson, Peter E Wright

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vital for Viruses: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Journal of molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. NMR illuminates intrinsic disorder.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Unexpected specificity within dynamic transcriptional protein-protein complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter HaberzDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and The Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California.
Munehito AraiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Maria A Martinez-YamoutDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and The Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California.
H Jane DysonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and The Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California.
Peter E WrightDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and The Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California.
Scripps Research Institute · USThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Structural basis for CBP/p300 transcriptional regulationR01CA096865 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2002 to 2016
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many viruses deregulate the cell and force transcription of viral genes by competing with cellular proteins for binding to the transcriptional co-activators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300. Through its interactions with CBP/p300 and the retinoblastoma protein, the adenovirus (AdV) early region 1A (E1A) oncoprotein hijacks the cell cycle and, in rodents, transforms the cell; the mechanistic and structural basis for these effects remain unclear. In this study we compare the affinity of protein constructs from the E1A proteins from two adenovirus serotypes, non-oncogenic AdV5 and highly oncogenic AdV12, for binding to the nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain (NCBD) of CBP. NMR spectra show that the E1A constructs from both serotypes are intrinsically disordered in the free state and that each contains three homologous binding sites for the NCBD, one in the N-terminal region and two within conserved region 1 (CR1) of E1A. The binding sites in CR1 correspond to the motifs that bind the retinoblastoma protein and the TAZ2 domain of CBP/p300. The E1A and NCBD peptides fold synergistically upon complex formation. Binding affinities determined from NMR titrations show that, although the overall affinities for AdV5 and AdV12 E1A are comparable, there are significant differences between the two E1A serotypes in the relative strength with which their constituent interaction motifs bind to the NCBD. The individual E1A interaction motifs were unable to compete effectively with p53 for binding to the NCBD and both the N-terminal region and CR1 region of E1A are required for efficient competition with p53.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdenovirus E1A ProteinsAmino Acid MotifsCREB-Binding ProteinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinProtein DomainsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Adenovirus E1A ProteinsCREB-Binding ProteinCREBBP protein, humanE1A-Associated p300 ProteinTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53adenovirusintrinsically disordered proteinNMRoncogenic viral protein

Identifiers

PMID27699893
PMCPMC5119557
OpenAlexW2528867623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.