Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699793›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2017

Genetic architecture of plant stress resistance: multi-trait genome-wide association mapping.

Manus P M Thoen, Nelson H Davila Olivas, Karen J Kloth, Silvia Coolen, Ping-Ping Huang, Mark G M Aarts, Johanna A Bac-Molenaar, Jaap Bakker, Harro J Bouwmeester, Colette Broekgaarden and 27 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Calcium Signaling and the Response to Heat Shock in Crop Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Manus P M ThoenLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Nelson H Davila OlivasLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Karen J KlothLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Silvia CoolenPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.56, 3508 TB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ping-Ping HuangLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Mark G M AartsLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5257-0740
Johanna A Bac-MolenaarLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jaap BakkerLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8213, 6700 ES, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Harro J BouwmeesterLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Colette BroekgaardenPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.56, 3508 TB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johan BucherWageningen University and Research Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline Busscher-LangeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Xi ChengLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Emilie F FradinLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Maarten A JongsmaBusiness Unit Bioscience, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Magdalena M JulkowskaSection of Plant Physiology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94215, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joost J B KeurentjesLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Wilco LigterinkLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Corné M J PietersePlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.56, 3508 TB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Carolien Ruyter-SpiraLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Geert SmantLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8213, 6700 ES, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Christa TesterinkSection of Plant Physiology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94215, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Björn UsadelInstitute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Worringer Weg 3, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Joop J A van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Johan A van PeltPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.56, 3508 TB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Casper C van SchaikLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8213, 6700 ES, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Saskia C M van WeesPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.56, 3508 TB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Richard G F VisserWageningen University and Research Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Roeland VoorripsWageningen University and Research Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Ben VosmanWageningen University and Research Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Dick VreugdenhilLaboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Sonja WarmerdamLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8213, 6700 ES, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Gerrie L WiegersLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Joost van HeerwaardenBiometris, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Willem KruijerBiometris, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Fred A van EeuwijkBiometris, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are exposed to combinations of various biotic and abiotic stresses, but stress responses are usually investigated for single stresses only. Here, we investigated the genetic architecture underlying plant responses to 11 single stresses and several of their combinations by phenotyping 350 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. A set of 214 000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was screened for marker-trait associations in genome-wide association (GWA) analyses using tailored multi-trait mixed models. Stress responses that share phytohormonal signaling pathways also share genetic architecture underlying these responses. After removing the effects of general robustness, for the 30 most significant SNPs, average quantitative trait locus (QTL) effect sizes were larger for dual stresses than for single stresses. Plants appear to deploy broad-spectrum defensive mechanisms influencing multiple traits in response to combined stresses. Association analyses identified QTLs with contrasting and with similar responses to biotic vs abiotic stresses, and below-ground vs above-ground stresses. Our approach allowed for an unprecedented comprehensive genetic analysis of how plants deal with a wide spectrum of stress conditions.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyArabidopsisDNA, BacterialGenes, PlantGenetic Association StudiesInheritance PatternsModels, GeneticMutationPhenotypePlant Growth RegulatorsQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of ResultsStress, PhysiologicalDNA, BacterialPlant Growth RegulatorsT-DNAabiotic stressbiotic stressgenetic architecturegenome-wide association mappingmultiple stresses

Identifiers

PMID27699793
PMCPMC5248600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.