Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699722›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2017

Imaging as an Outcome Measure in Multiple Sclerosis.

Daniel Ontaneda, Robert J Fox

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Efficacy of rituximab in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Insights from magnetic resonance imaging and disability assessments.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Assessing brain injury topographically using MR neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel OntanedaMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. ontaned@ccf.org.
Robert J FoxMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandKL2TR000440 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$11.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive to lesion formation both in the brain and spinal cord. Imaging plays a prominent role in the diagnosis and monitoring of MS. Over a dozen anti-inflammatory therapies are approved for MS and the development of many of these medications was made possible through the use of contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI as a phase II outcome. A similar phase II outcome method for the neurodegeneration that underlies progressive courses of the disease is still unavailable. Although magnetic resonance is an invaluable tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment effects in MS, several imaging barriers still exist. In general, MRI is less sensitive to gray matter lesions, lacks pathological specificity, and does not provide quantitative data easily. Several advanced imaging methods including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer, functional MRI, myelin water fraction imaging, ultra-high field MRI, positron emission tomography, and optical coherence tomography of the retina study promising ways of overcoming the difficulties in MS imaging.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAtrophyBiomarkersBrainClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionGray MatterHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMultiple SclerosisMyelin SheathPositron-Emission TomographySensitivity and SpecificitySpinal CordTomography, Optical CoherenceBiomarkersatrophybiomarkerlesionsMRIMultiple sclerosisoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID27699722
PMCPMC5233623
OpenAlexW2528519892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.