Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699631›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2016

Estimating the Societal Benefits of THA After Accounting for Work Status and Productivity: A Markov Model Approach.

Lane Koenig, Qian Zhang, Matthew S Austin, Berna Demiralp, Thomas K Fehring, Chaoling Feng, Richard C Mather, Jennifer T Nguyen, Asha Saavoss, Bryan D Springer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparable dislocation and revision rates for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with subsequent or prior lumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Clinical outcomes and complication profile of total hip arthroplasty after lumbar spine fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Return to work following total hip arthroplasty: a Japanese retrospective cohort study highlighting the impact on satisfaction and life purpose.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Patient Perceptions of COVID-19-Related Surgical Delay: An Analysis of Patients Awaiting Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lane KoenigKNG Health Consulting, LLC, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 365, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. Lane.Koenig@knghealth.com.
Qian ZhangMaryland Health Care Commission, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Matthew S AustinThe Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Berna DemiralpKNG Health Consulting, LLC, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 365, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Thomas K FehringOrthoCarolina, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Chaoling FengKNG Health Consulting, LLC, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 365, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Richard C MatherDuke Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer T NguyenKNG Health Consulting, LLC, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 365, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Asha SaavossKNG Health Consulting, LLC, 15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 365, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Bryan D SpringerOrthoCarolina, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Adolph J YatesUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
KNG Health Consulting (United States) · USOrthoCarolina · USDuke Medical Center · USRothman Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is high and expected to continue to grow during the next decade. Although much of this growth includes working-aged patients, cost-effectiveness studies on THA have not fully incorporated the productivity effects from surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What is the expected effect of THA on patients' employment and earnings? (2) How does accounting for these effects influence the cost-effectiveness of THA relative to nonsurgical treatment?

methodsTaking a societal perspective, we used a Markov model to assess the overall cost-effectiveness of THA compared with nonsurgical treatment. We estimated direct medical costs using Medicare claims data and indirect costs (employment status and worker earnings) using regression models and nonparametric simulations. For direct costs, we estimated average spending 1 year before and after surgery. Spending estimates included physician and related services, hospital inpatient and outpatient care, and postacute care. For indirect costs, we estimated the relationship between functional status and productivity, using data from the National Health Interview Survey and regression analysis. Using regression coefficients and patient survey data, we ran a nonparametric simulation to estimate productivity (probability of working multiplied by earnings if working minus the value of missed work days) before and after THA. We used the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to obtain revision rates because it contained osteoarthritis-specific THA revision rates by age and gender, which were unavailable in other registry reports. Other model assumptions were extracted from a previously published cost-effectiveness analysis that included a comprehensive literature review. We incorporated all parameter estimates into Markov models to assess THA effects on quality-adjusted life years and lifetime costs. We conducted threshold and sensitivity analyses on direct costs, indirect costs, and revision rates to assess the robustness of our Markov model results.

resultsCompared with nonsurgical treatments, THA increased average annual productivity of patients by USD 9503 (95% CI, USD 1446-USD 17,812). We found that THA increases average lifetime direct costs by USD 30,365, which were offset by USD 63,314 in lifetime savings from increased productivity. With net societal savings of USD 32,948 per patient, total lifetime societal savings were estimated at almost USD 10 billion from more than 300,000 THAs performed in the United States each year.

conclusionsUsing a Markov model approach, we show that THA produces societal benefits that can offset the costs of THA. When comparing THA with other nonsurgical treatments, policymakers should consider the long-term benefits associated with increased productivity from surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, economic and decision analysis.

Indexed as

EfficiencyHealth Care CostsMarkov ChainsSalaries and Fringe BenefitsAbsenteeismAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesEmploymentFemaleHip JointHumans

Identifiers

PMID27699631
PMCPMC5085951
OpenAlexW2527961475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.