Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699618›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2017

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Guideline for Low Back Pain: Process-Evaluation Among Health Care Professionals.

Arnela Suman, Frederieke G Schaafsma, Rachelle Buchbinder, Maurits W van Tulder, Johannes R Anema

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arnela SumanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederieke G SchaafsmaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.schaafsma@vumc.nl.
Rachelle BuchbinderMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Suite 41, Cabrini Medical Centre, 183 Wattletree Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3144, Australia.
Maurits W van TulderDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth & Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes R AnemaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCabrini Hospital · AU

Funding

ZonMw 80-83700-98-133053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background To reduce the burden of low back pain (LBP) in the Netherlands, a multidisciplinary guideline for LBP has been implemented in Dutch primary care using a multifaceted implementation strategy targeted at health care professionals (HCPs) and patients. The current paper describes the process evaluation of the implementation among HCPs. Methods The strategy aimed to improve multidisciplinary collaboration and communication, and consisted of 7 components. This process evaluation was performed using the Linnan and Steckler framework. Data were collected using a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative data. Results 128 HCPs participated in the implementation study, of which 96 participated in quantitative and 21 participated in qualitative evaluation. Overall dose delivered for this study was 89 %, and the participants were satisfied with the strategy, mostly with the multidisciplinary approach, which contributed to the mutual understanding of each other's disciplines and perspectives. While the training sessions did not yield any new information, the strategy created awareness of the guideline and its recommendations, contributing to positively changing attitudes and aiding in improving guideline adherent behaviour. However, many barriers to implementation still exist, including personal and practical factors, confidence, dependence and distrust issues among the HCPs, as well as policy factors (e.g. reimbursement systems). Conclusions The data presented in this paper have shown that the strategy that was used to implement the guideline in a Dutch primary care setting was feasible, especially when using a multidisciplinary approach. However, identified barriers for implementation have been identified and should be addressed in future implementation.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth PersonnelHumansLow Back PainMaleNetherlandsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPractice Guidelines as TopicQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesGuideline implementationHealthcare professionalsLow back painMultifaceted implementation strategyProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27699618
PMCPMC5591342
OpenAlexW2528362813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.