Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699518›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia in patients with previous Heller myotomy.

Helle Ø Kristensen, Jakob Kirkegård, Daniel Willy Kjær, Frank Viborg Mortensen, Rastislav Kunda, Niels Christian Bjerregaard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Modern Age of POEM: the Past, Present and Future of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
  18. Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Recent Advances in Third-Space Endoscopy.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helle Ø KristensenDepartment of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, L-research, Building 1C, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jakob KirkegårdDepartment of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, L-research, Building 1C, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. jakob.kirkegaard@auh.rm.dk.
Daniel Willy KjærDepartment of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, L-research, Building 1C, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Frank Viborg MortensenDepartment of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, L-research, Building 1C, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Rastislav KundaDepartment of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, L-research, Building 1C, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Niels Christian BjerregaardDepartment of Surgery, Section for Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, L-research, Building 1C, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging procedure in the treatment of esophageal achalasia, a primary motility disorder. However, the long-term outcome of POEM in patients, who have previously undergone a Heller myotomy, is unknown.

methodsUsing a local database, we identified patients with esophageal achalasia, who underwent POEM. We compared patients with a previous Heller myotomy to those, who had received none or only non-surgical therapy prior to the POEM procedure. We conducted follow-up examinations at 3, 12, and 24 months following the procedure.

resultsWe included 66 consecutive patients undergoing POEM for achalasia, of which 14 (21.2 %) had undergone a prior Heller myotomy. In both groups, the preoperative Eckardt score was 7. Postoperatively, the non-Heller group experienced a more pronounced symptom relief at both 3-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up compared with the Heller group, and there was a tendency for the effect of POEM to reduce over time. We suggest that there is a correlation between preoperative measurements of gastroesophageal sphincter pressures and the chance of a successful POEM.

conclusionsPOEM has a place in the treatment of esophageal achalasia in patients with a prior Heller myotomy and persistent symptoms as it is a safe procedure with acceptable long-term results.

Indexed as

Natural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryAdultAgedEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFemaleHeller MyotomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAchalasiaEsophagusHeller myotomyMotility disorderPeroral endoscopic myotomyPOEM

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.