Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699416›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2016

Specificity and timescales of cortical adaptation as inferences about natural movie statistics.

Michoel Snow, Ruben Coen-Cagli, Odelia Schwartz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Relating Divisive Normalization to Neuronal Response Variability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Compressive Temporal Summation in Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Visual discomfort and flicker.Vision research · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michoel SnowDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, and Dominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. michoel.snow@med.einstein.yu.edu
Ruben Coen-CagliDepartment of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Switzerland Department of Systems and Computational Biology, and Dominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. ruben.coen-cagli@einstein.yu.edu https://sites.google.com/site/rubencoencagli/
Odelia SchwartzDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA Dominick Purpura Department of Neuroscience, and Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. odelia@cs.miami.edu http://www.cs.miami.edu/home/odelia/
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007288 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI AKABAS, MYLES H. · 1985 to 2022
$35.6M
CRCNS: Spatiotemporal Scene Statistics and Contextual Influences in VisionR01EY021371 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KOHN, ADAM, SCHWARTZ, ODELIA · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021371NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptation is a phenomenological umbrella term under which a variety of temporal contextual effects are grouped. Previous models have shown that some aspects of visual adaptation reflect optimal processing of dynamic visual inputs, suggesting that adaptation should be tuned to the properties of natural visual inputs. However, the link between natural dynamic inputs and adaptation is poorly understood. Here, we extend a previously developed Bayesian modeling framework for spatial contextual effects to the temporal domain. The model learns temporal statistical regularities of natural movies and links these statistics to adaptation in primary visual cortex via divisive normalization, a ubiquitous neural computation. In particular, the model divisively normalizes the present visual input by the past visual inputs only to the degree that these are inferred to be statistically dependent. We show that this flexible form of normalization reproduces classical findings on how brief adaptation affects neuronal selectivity. Furthermore, prior knowledge acquired by the Bayesian model from natural movies can be modified by prolonged exposure to novel visual stimuli. We show that this updating can explain classical results on contrast adaptation. We also simulate the recent finding that adaptation maintains population homeostasis, namely, a balanced level of activity across a population of neurons with different orientation preferences. Consistent with previous disparate observations, our work further clarifies the influence of stimulus-specific and neuronal-specific normalization signals in adaptation.

Indexed as

Motion PicturesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBayes TheoremHumansModels, NeurologicalNeuronsOrientationSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID27699416
PMCPMC5054764
OpenAlexW2529327698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.