ArticleJAMA neurology2016
Diagnosing Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease by the Detection of Abnormal Prion Protein in Patient Urine.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing prion diagnostics: full-length human E200K RT-QuIC substrate facilitates prion detection in tear fluid and improves sensitivity in cerebrospinal fluid.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Biological Fluid Biomarkers in Human Prion Diseases with a Note on Biosafety.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Detection of prions in the urine of patients affected by sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Harnessing the Physiological Functions of Cellular Prion Protein in the Kidneys: Applications for Treating Renal Diseases.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Wide distribution of prion infectivity in the peripheral tissues of vCJD and sCJD patients.Acta neuropathologica · 2021Article
- Biomarkers and diagnostic guidelines for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.The Lancet. Neurology · 2021Review
- Detection of Pathognomonic Biomarker PrPBiomolecules · 2020Review
- Improving the Predictive Value of Prion Inactivation Validation Methods to Minimize the Risks of Iatrogenic Transmission With Medical Instruments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Challenges and Advances in Antemortem Diagnosis of Human Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Role of prion protein glycosylation in replication of human prions by protein misfolding cyclic amplification.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2019Article
- PMCA-replicated PrPScientific reports · 2019Article
- Prion Diseases.Neurologic clinics · 2018Review
- Detection of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions in skin: implications for healthcare.Genome medicine · 2018Article
- Neuroradiology of human prion diseases, diagnosis and differential diagnosis.La Radiologia medica · 2017Review
- CJD mimics and chameleons.Practical neurology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceCreutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder associated with the accumulation of infectious abnormal prion protein through a mechanism of templated misfolding. A recent report has described the detection of abnormal prion protein in the urine of patients with variant CJD (vCJD) using protein misfolding by cyclic amplification, which was apparently absent in the more common sporadic form of CJD (sCJD). A noninvasive diagnostic test could improve early diagnosis of sCJD and, by screening donations, mitigate the potential risks of prion transmission through human urine-derived pharmaceuticals. Here, we describe the adaptation of the direct detection assay, developed originally as a blood test for vCJD, for the detection of disease-associated prion protein in urine samples from patients with sCJD.
objectiveTo determine the feasibility of sCJD diagnosis by adaptation of an established vCJD diagnostic blood test to urine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study included anonymized urine samples from healthy nonneurological control individuals (n = 91), patients with non-prion neurodegenerative diseases (n = 34), and patients with prion disease (n = 37) of which 20 had sCJD. Urine samples obtained during the Medical Research Council PRION-1 Trial, the National Prion Monitoring Cohort Study, and/or referred to the National Prion Clinic or Dementia Research Centre at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presence of sCJD infection determined by an assay that captures, enriches, and detects disease-associated prion protein isoforms.
resultsA total of 162 samples were analyzed, composed of 91 normal control individuals (51 male, 33 female, and 7 not recorded), 34 neurological disease control individuals (19 male and 15 female), and 37 with prion disease (22 male and 15 female). The assay's specificity for prion disease was 100% (95% CI, 97%-100%), with no false-positive reactions from 125 control individuals, including 34 from a range of neurodegenerative diseases. In contrast to a previous study, which used a different method, sensitivity to vCJD infection was low (7.7%; 95% CI, 0.2%-36%), with only 1 of 13 patients with positive test results, while sensitivity to sCJD was unexpectedly high at 40% (95% CI, 19%-64%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We determined 40% of sCJD urine sample results as positive. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an assay that can detect sCJD infection in urine or any target analyte outside of the central nervous system. Urine detection could allow the development of rapid, molecular diagnostics for sCJD and has implications for other neurodegenerative diseases where disease-related assemblies of misfolded proteins might also be present in urine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.