Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699224›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2016

Systemic restoration of UBA1 ameliorates disease in spinal muscular atrophy.

Rachael A Powis, Evangelia Karyka, Penelope Boyd, Julien Côme, Ross A Jones, Yinan Zheng, Eva Szunyogova, Ewout Jn Groen, Gillian Hunter, Derek Thomson and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patient-specific responses toMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  6. Oncotarget · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael A PowisEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Evangelia KarykaSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Penelope BoydEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Julien CômeINSERM/UEVE UMR861, Institute for Stem cell Therapy and Exploration of Monogenic Diseases (I-Stem), Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
Ross A JonesEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Yinan ZhengEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Eva SzunyogovaEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Ewout Jn GroenEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Gillian HunterEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Derek ThomsonCentre for Cognitive and Neural Systems.
Thomas M WishartEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Catherina G BeckerEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Simon H ParsonEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Cécile MartinatINSERM/UEVE UMR861, Institute for Stem cell Therapy and Exploration of Monogenic Diseases (I-Stem), Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
Mimoun AzzouzSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Thomas H GillingwaterEuan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research and.
Mott MacDonald (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20251969Medical Research Council G1001492Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by loss of survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Molecular pathways that are disrupted downstream of SMN therefore represent potentially attractive therapeutic targets for SMA. Here, we demonstrate that therapeutic targeting of ubiquitin pathways disrupted as a consequence of SMN depletion, by increasing levels of one key ubiquitination enzyme (ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 [UBA1]), represents a viable approach for treating SMA. Loss of UBA1 was a conserved response across mouse and zebrafish models of SMA as well as in patient induced pluripotent stem cell-derive motor neurons. Restoration of UBA1 was sufficient to rescue motor axon pathology and restore motor performance in SMA zebrafish. Adeno-associated virus serotype 9-UBA1 (AAV9-UBA1) gene therapy delivered systemic increases in UBA1 protein levels that were well tolerated over a prolonged period in healthy control mice. Systemic restoration of UBA1 in SMA mice ameliorated weight loss, increased survival and motor performance, and improved neuromuscular and organ pathology. AAV9-UBA1 therapy was also sufficient to reverse the widespread molecular perturbations in ubiquitin homeostasis that occur during SMA. We conclude that UBA1 represents a safe and effective therapeutic target for the treatment of both neuromuscular and systemic aspects of SMA.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAnimalsGene Knockdown TechniquesHomeostasisHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMotor NeuronsMuscular Atrophy, SpinalUbiquitin-Activating EnzymesZebrafishUBA1 protein, humanUbiquitin-Activating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID27699224
PMCPMC5033939
OpenAlexW2505641731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.