Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27699179›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes research2016

Effects of a Patient-Provider, Collaborative, Medication-Planning Tool: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

James F Graumlich, Huaping Wang, Anna Madison, Michael S Wolf, Darren Kaiser, Kumud Dahal, Daniel G Morrow

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Literature Review of Type 2 Diabetes Management and Health Literacy.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Improving adherence and outcomes in diabetic patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James F GraumlichDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, 530 Northeast Glen Oak Avenue, Peoria, IL 61637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1272-0780
Huaping WangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Research Services, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61605, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6574-1465
Anna MadisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 E. Daniel, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-3743
Michael S WolfDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 North Lake Shore Drive, 10th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Darren KaiserNorthwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, 675 North Saint Clair Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Kumud DahalDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61605, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-7687
Daniel G MorrowDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Education Building, 1310 South 6th Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among patients with various levels of health literacy, the effects of collaborative, patient-provider, medication-planning tools on outcomes relevant to self-management are uncertain.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionSelf CareAdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27699179
PMCPMC5028848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.